[NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -- now judgeing the M

Glen Watson gwatson11 at houston.rr.com
Tue Oct 17 12:22:28 AKDT 2006


Gray.thanks, you have the unique ability to state the obvious with such
flair.

 

Again thanks for the clarity.

 

Glen

 

 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:58 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question --
nowjudgeing the M

 


Understood subjectivity will always be part pattern...

Let's see a show of hands of those who would apply a downgrade to an M flown
technically correct according to the AMA judging criteria although the belly
was seen during 1 or both of the stall turns.

Glen 


No downgrade......who says the belly of the plane presents less well? That
is BEYOND subjectivty and into crack smokin'. 

People, please stop inventing rules that are not there.  That kind of
garbage is exactly what judges with grudges use to damage people they do not
like, which we all know happens...so please stop interpreting between the
lines. It does not HAVE to be the way you think..only the way the rules
say-gosh darn it (substituted expression to clear censors). 

Have a nice day otherwise 



Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061017/dd4c5efa/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list