[NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency

[Derek Koopowitz]

Actually the judge #'s were replaced with #### at Pensecola.  :)

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
Stebbins
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:58 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency


At Pensacola the info shown was made available -identified to a judges
number. I never saw a list of the Judges names related to an ID.
The rule only says the scores given----by each judge,----not also
identifying the Judge.
Interesting that AMA has never addressed this issue.
My best shot
Jerry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lance  <mailto:patterndude at comcast.net> Van Nostrand 
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 7:17 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency

To all rule-meisters,
 
I know there are some on this list that have deep insight into the intent
and history of the F3A sporting code.  I hope to either get a solid answer
or pointed in the right direction.  This is not an idle request.
 
Part 5.1.8 Marking - last sentence 
The scores given by each judge for each competitor shall be made public at
the end of each round of competition.

What level of transparency is mandated?  Is it enough to report the scores
from judge 1-4 or is it expected that the identity of the judge be known as
well?

--Lance

 



  _____  




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061121/75868816/attachment.html