[NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency
jonlowe at aol.com
jonlowe at aol.com
Mon Nov 20 05:25:14 AKST 2006
Jerry,
Actually, AMA has, sort of. This is from the general section of the
AMA rule book:
"8. Review of Scores. It is mandatory that all contestants of
Class AA, AAA, and AAAA meets who desire to do so be
permitted to review their detailed score sheet (e.g., in CL
Aerobatics, the score for each maneuver; in Scale, the score
for each characteristic judged, whether of a static or inflight
nature; in Navy Carrier, the scores for high speed,
low speed, landing, and bonus) for each flight prior to
attempting any subsequent flight(s) and in all instances
prior to announcement of winners and awarding of prizes.
It is recommended that the contestant be provided with a
carbon copy of the actual score sheet for the purpose of
complying with this regulation. Neither the contestant nor
anyone representing him shall talk to an Event Judge
regarding any contestant’s score during the contest, unless
Judge and Event or Contest Director are the same person.
All questions regarding the score sheet are to be asked of
the Director. Violations of this rule are sufficient cause for
flight or entry disqualification. While errors in score
computation shall be corrected, at no time shall the number
of points awarded for an individual maneuver or
characteristic be altered."
There are a several interesting things here.
1. They recommend using a carbon copy of the actual score sheet, which
means you would get what the judge wrote, not what was entered in
scoring. This means that the juge identification would be on the
sheet, but maybe not the name. Typically, a judge uses initials. I
guess in todays world, a Xerox copy would work.
2. A pilot or pilots rep asking a judge about his scores for ANY
contestant is grounds for disqualification.
3. Also, the common practice, at least in the southeast, of not posting
or providing the score sheets for the last round of the contest before
awarding prizes, is illegal, according to this rule.
Jon Lowe
-----Original Message-----
From: JAStebbins at worldnet.att.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency
At Pensacola the info shown was made available -identified to a judges
number. I never saw a list of the Judges names related to an ID.
The rule only says the scores given----by each judge,----not also
identifying the Judge.
Interesting that AMA has never addressed this issue.
My best shot
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Lance Van Nostrand
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 7:17 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] FAI sporting code on judge transparency
To all rule-meisters,
I know there are some on this list that have deep insight into the
intent and history of the F3A sporting code. I hope to either get a
solid answer or pointed in the right direction. This is not an idle
request.
Part 5.1.8 Marking - last sentence
The scores given by each judge for each competitor shall be made public
at the end of each round of competition.
What level of transparency is mandated? Is it enough to report the
scores from judge 1-4 or is it expected that the identity of the judge
be known as well?
--Lance
--------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list