[NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
Richard Strickland
richard.s at allied-callaway.com
Wed Nov 15 14:13:47 AKST 2006
Don't get your picture taken with Harrison--he makes everyone else look fat.
Hi Mike!
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dr. Mike
Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:26 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah.......
----- Original Message -----
From: Gray E Fowler
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
Good God almighty! Mike Harrison on the list! Can Art Wagner be far
behind?
Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org wrote on 11/15/2006 02:41:42
PM:
> Thanks George!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george w. kennie
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
>
> Welcome to the list Mike!!!!!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dr. Mike Harrison
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
>
> Peter,
> Hi,
> I am Mike Harrison, I worked with APC to develop these props. Let
> me tell you the goal of the prop design. It is to fly at a moderate
> to slow constant speed under the noise limit but with good pulling
> performance. Therefore, regarding the rpm, the 8000 is about ideal
> for that prop, turn it much more and you will be above the noise
limit.
>
> I find it interesting that you determine whether a prop is adequate
> by first tacking it. I would think you would fly it first to see if
> it was adequate. I would encourage you to do that first. The OS
> 140 turns it about the same and it flies very well.
>
> The whole purpose was to develop a prop that would fly at a
> deliberate pace at about 150 meters to compete with the electrics.
>
> There is also an 18.5x9.5 which I fly and it turns about 7500 rpm.
> I like it better than the 18.1x10. I am working on a 19x9 at the
moment.
>
> Good luck
> Mike
> From: Peter Pennisi
> To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 5:48 PM
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] APC 18.1 x 10W props
>
>
> I recently purchased some 18.1 x 10W APC props for my DZ160.
> Apparently there appears to be another version 18.1 x 10.1.
>
> Could someone please tell me the difference between both?
>
> I tried a quick ground run on this prop (stock) this morning but
> could barely get 8000 RPM from the engine. I will take advice from a
> member on this list and lop 1/4inch of each blade. What RPM readings
> are people getting who are using either of these props on a YS DZ160
engine?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061115/881e4bb6/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list