[NSRCA-discussion] CG
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Mon May 29 16:02:18 AKDT 2006
On May 29, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> >> Also, the wing and stab area should include the ailerons and
> elevators, respectively.
>
> When calculating wing/stab area, are you also including the area
> occupied by the fuselage? Such that an 18" wing root on a 6" wide
> body would add 108 sq in to the panel area.
In my calculations I do include the area occupied by the fuselage. I
assume the calculation by Nat does as well, but I don't speak for him.
Ron Van Putte
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 6:07 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CG
>
>
> On May 29, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Nat Penton wrote:
>
>> The following formula was presented by noted British modeller
>> Gordon Whitehead in How To Make Scale Models Fly ( 1980 ??). I
>> have been using it over 20 years and find it dead on for pattern:
>> CG (from LE MAC) = MAC/6 + 0.25x As/Aw M
>> As - area stab Aw - area wing
>> M - moment arm, ac to ac
>> It is easy to use the graphic method to find the wing MAC. You can
>> guess at the stab MAC and be close enough.
>> The formula works on anything from a tailess to a Quickie.
>
> Nat - I haven't compared the formula with the one I developed more
> than 40 years ago, but I think yours would be better understood if
> you use some parentheses:
>
> CG (from LE MAC) = MAC/6 + 0.25x (As/Aw) M
>
> Also, the wing and stab area should include the ailerons and
> elevators, respectively.
>
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060530/12146556/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list