[NSRCA-discussion] Two killed by model airplane

[brett terry]

Good points, all.  Maybe this sort of feature could be tied in with an
autopilot system to level the wings and maintain altitude until the
interference is gone.



On 5/21/06, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Any RF link can be interfered with, marketing hype aside.  The DSS
> systems will primarily offer protection from each other, which is definitely
> a good thing.  It's not going to be completely effective at rejecting other
> sources of RF on the same channels that arrive after initial open channel
> has completed at startup.  Not everyone plays by the same rules from a
> protocol observance standpoint.  Net-net, they won't be immune to
> intererence, although they may be a significant improvement from what we
> have today.
>
> Again, what I am proposing is simple to do and could be incorprated in any
> radio technology.  For that matter, it could even be a pot (potentiometer
> replacement) to an unused extra channel if older transmitters needed the
> feature.  A small protocol module add-in takes over the function of a pot,
> could be swapped by a skilled modeler or better yet, Radio South,
> Horzon/Hobby Services etc.  Bingo, you have your failsafe protocol ready to
> interface with 3rd party kill switches, audible alert speakers etc.
>
> Ed
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060521/fbe81813/attachment.html