[NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
Chad Northeast
chadnortheast at shaw.ca
Wed Mar 29 06:06:37 AKST 2006
Jeff
Bernd Beschorner ran this setup in France...I have no numbers for the improvment in cooling but I know from my own experience when I took the spinner off and just let air enter the front of the motor it was a huge difference so it probably works quite well.
The other (cheaper) option is to get a plastic spinner that mounts with screws around the edges (great planes makes them I think) and simply cut a hole in the front of the spinner. Remove as many spokes on the backplate as possible.
Rex L. also did a neat mod to his TT spinner that he say's works very well.
I think you will see a lot of good ideas for cooling outrunners coming this summer that are simple, low cost and effective....it just takes time for everyone to get the R&D done :)
Problem for myself is that with our climate cooling is not really an issue....we are lucky to see more than 80-85F for most of the year :) Let me tell you, at 50-60F things stay very cool :)
Chad
----- Original Message -----
From: jeffghughes at comcast.net
Date: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:59 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> I guess it's true, great minds think alike! :) Anybody know if it
> works?
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: Chad Northeast <chad at f3acanada.org>
>
> > Jeff,
> >
> > Its been done :)
> >
> > http://www.plettenberg-motoren.com/german/zuxtra.htm
> >
> > Chad
> >
> > jeffghughes at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > > Matt,
> > > Your missing my point. I have never doubted that a "properly"
> designed
> > > duct can increase cooling. I just doubt that most modelers
> have
> > > "properly" designed duct work in their planes. The ducts we
> make
> > > increase cooling over not having any duct work, but I've built
> and
> > > flown a lot of planes with engines and motors un-cowled that
> didn't
> > > overheat either! My initial statement was around uncowled
> outrunner
> > > motors. Why not have them up front and exposed? Save a lot of
> grief
> > > and might just look good (or not, it just might look
> industrial). We
> > > as pattern folks always seem to do the harder right, instead
> of the
> > > easier right.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------- Original message --------------
> > > From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
> > > Jeff, how do you increase air velocity around the motor with
> no
> > > increase in model airspeed?
> > > Here's where our old friend Bernoulli comes in, stage left.
> > >
> > > And BTW, the properly designed ENTRY into and EXIT from the
> > > ducting really increases the ducting efficiency.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jeffghughes at comcast.net
> > > To: NSRCA Mailing List ; NSRCA
> > > Mailing List
> > > Sent: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:10:39 +0000
> > > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> > >
> > > While I agree good ducting can be better than hanging out
> there, I
> > > seriously doubt if most modelers do any better than hanging it
> > > out. Plus I think an outrunner all polished up woul look
> pretty
> > > cool with the fuse faired into it.
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------- Original message --------------
> > > From: "Dean Pappas"
> > > Good ducting is better than hanging in the breeze, and a whole
> > > lot prettier.
> > >
> > > Dean Pappas
> > > Sr. Design Engineer
> > > Kodeos Communications
> > > 111 Corporate Blvd.
> > > South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
> > > (908) 222-7817 phone
> > > (908) 222-2392 fax
> > > d.pappas at kodeos.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> > > [nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On
> > > Behalf Of *jeffghughes at comcast.net
> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:49 PM
> > > *To:* NSRCA Mailing List; NSRCA Mailing List
> > > *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> > >
> > > I was thinking about this the other day. Why don't we
> > > change the fuse design to stick the motor out in the
> > > breeze? Kind of like a WWI rotary or a foamy. Seems like
> > > we're trying hard to keep the planes identical in design
> > > between electrics and fuel for no apparent reasons
> > >
> > > Also now that huge props and braking are available, will
> > > fuselages slim down some?
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------- Original message --------------
> > > From: "Dean Pappas"
> > >
> > > > Hi Earl,
> > > > This sounds a whole lot loke the similar duct I have
> > > placed around my AXI
> > > > outrunner.
> > > > It is astounding how much a difference a real
> > > cooling duct makes.
> > > > Fans inside the motor are a band-aid. The top-down
> > > solution is good airflow
> > > > management.
> > > >
> > > > The picture is of the ductwork in the Funtana I am
> > > doing for FM.
> > > > The subject is modifying the plane for
> > > high-performance electric. (high heat and
> > > > RF generation)
> > > > The airbox in the front of the cowl encloses the
> > > front of the motor,
> > > > and feeds the internals and the 1/8" gap in the duct
> > > with high pressure air.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > later,
> > > > Dean
> > > >
> > > > Dean Pappas
> > > >
> > >
> > > Attached Message
> > > From: Dean Pappas
> > > To: NSRCA Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> > > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:19:00 +0000
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > >
> > > Subject:
> > > Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Reducing the odds...
> > > From:
> > > rcmaster199 at aol.com
> > > Date:
> > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:14:17 +0000
> > > To:
> > > nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >
> > > To:
> > > nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list