[NSRCA-discussion] klipped to repost.. Snap

[Keith Hoard]

Perhaps an appropriate "grunt" would do??

On 7/9/06, Ed Miller <edbon85 at charter.net> wrote:
>
>  Rick, you pushed me over the edge. I couldn't decide on the new brand F
> 12 or 14 radio but your mention of recording the politically acceptable
> stick sounds seals the deal, the 14 it is. :)
> Ed M.
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Rick Wallace <rickwallace45 at hotmail.com>
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>  *Sent:* Sunday, July 09, 2006 12:57 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] klipped to repost.. Snap
>
>
>
> Do we need to make the sticks / springs loud for judges just like some
> judges ask for the pilot's caller to speak loud enough for them to hear?
>
> ... and so we know, what's the accepted '10' stick sound for a snap? the
> squeek of all the springs being stretched at the almost but not exactly the
> same time, or just the 'boing' as the stick is released to re-center at the
> end?
>
> Guess the guys with the 14channel Brand 'F' TXs will have the advantage
> here since they can record and playback sounds as needed...
>
> exiting...
>
>
> In a message dated 7/7/2006 10:00:26 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> jpavlick at idseng.com writes:
>
> Yeah, what are they supposed to sound like anyway? Mine are always quiet.
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of *JShulman
> *Sent:* Friday, July 07, 2006 1:26 PM
> *To:* randy10926 at comtekmail.com; NSRCA Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] klipped to repost.. Snap
>
> Heard from the sticks??? That's a good one.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of *Glenn Hatfield
> *Sent:* Friday, July 07, 2006 12:54 PM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] klipped to repost.. Snap
>
>  We need descriptive language that is widely understood.  We judge by the
> rule book and not what is widely accepted.  If someone is judging by what
> they understand is a snap and not what the rule book stands, then they be a
> bad judge.  I have seen this many times,  we had a gentlemen that judged
> snaps partially be what he heard from the sticks, instead of what he saw.
>
> Randy
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>


-- 

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060709/032f9cda/attachment-0001.html