[NSRCA-discussion] Good 9411 Replacement
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sun Jul 2 20:40:35 AKDT 2006
Hmmm, they apparently changed more than the servo processor in this version.
It delivers 25% less torque AND speed than the 9411 sa. So at 65$ you gotta
wonder why bother making the expense for a 2 meter pattern model. Sure the 9411
costs more but the performance is superior (on paper and in reality).
One thing to consider about a .22 sec transit time, the response lag is
noticeable on ailerons and elevators, particularly in snaps. If your schedule isn't
as demanding as the higher schedules, then the slower speed shouldn't be too
much of a problem.
MattK
In a message dated 7/2/2006 11:31:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
troy_newman at msn.com writes:
JR 9011 is basically the same servo in an analog version.....This servo I
don't feel is adequate for ailerons on a 2M plane. I feel with today's
powerplants 60in-oz on Ailerons is very marginal....at the least it is a minimum for
sure. I don't feel going with the min needed is the best practice.
http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=JRPS9011
Troy
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Pavlock
To: NSRCA Discussion List
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Good 9411 Replacement
Does anyone know of a good replacement for a JR 9411 in an analog servo.
Mainly I am looking for a servo with the same dimensions, irregardless of its
specs.
Thanks!
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060703/460d5834/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list