[NSRCA-discussion] Thunder Power TP-1010C & TP-210V Available

[Cameron Smith]

Dang Adam I DID NOT mean for that to go to the list!!!
 Your experience & knowledge in this forum & others are watched and of
great value.
   I am VERY sensitive around a lot of these issues & personalities in
this hobby. Especially around batteries.
  Just knowing it wasn't personal gives me relief. I should not have let
it bug me. But I have very thin skin on certain subjects, for that I
apologize.
  A lot of guys are very hesitant to post & ask questions OR even relay
there experience in fear of being belittled. I realize now that was not
your intention.
  I will let this go to the list and please accept my most sincere
apology for NOT sending this PRIVATE as I intended. 

                        Cameron Smith

 
   

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Adam
Glatt
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 10:33 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Thunder Power TP-1010C & TP-210V
Available

Cameron, I appreciate the advice.  My intention was to inform all the 
people venturing into electric power that this new system will make 
their lives easier and their hobby safer and cheaper.  Evidently I'm 
still useless when it comes to the relation portion of the message.

-Adam

Cameron Smith wrote:
> Adam,
>  I sent this post to the group because there are OTHERS out there who
> might be on the look out for this product. There are others who do
> follow new products on the horizon & would like to have them. Maybe
busy
> in there lives to not know where they may surface on vender shelves.
>  Your tone in your statement:   There's nothing supposed about it.  
>  Was taken as unnecessary & not very friendly.
>    I didn't want to get into a side by side, Feature for Feature or
>  In-depth reproduction of the operational manual, Internet blogs or
> Manufacturing/designing companies key feature advantage aspects.
>   It was sent as a "Heads up" for those who might already know
something
> about what they are looking for & jump on it. It was sent as a helpful
> tip. Something this discussion group goes too long without generating.
> NOT to become a target for RUDE or UNNESSASRY comments.
>  After receiving comments from 2 others on this list about your reply
I
> just thought I would respond and say my piece IN PRIVATE. I don't
> believe I know you or have ever said a word to you. I hope I have
never
> acted that way towards you.
>   
>
>                       Cameron Smith
>             
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf of Adam
GATT
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 7:44 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Thunder Power TP-1010C & TP-210V
> Available
>
> There's nothing supposed about it.  The 1010+210 combination blows
away 
> everything on the market.
>
> Charge two 5s packs in series
> Balances all 10 s banks to extreme accuracy
> Charger will display voltage to x.xxx V for every s bank
> 210W of charging power
> discharge to three selectable voltages (capacity check and optimum
> storage)
> safety features:
> high imbalance -> reduced charge rate or charge abort
> wrong cell count entered -> charge won't start
>
> Charger is $200, balancer is $100.  Considering the competition in the

> 200+W market, there is no debate about which is the right purchase.
The
>
> ability to charge two 5s packs with one charger means you need half as

> many chargers.
>
> The 1010 is impossible to get right now, and will be for quite a
while.
>
> Anyone considering this charger should jump on Atlanta's stock.
>
> -Adam
>
> Cameron Smith wrote:
>   
>> For those Interested & Waiting Cliff @ www.atlantahobby.com 
>> <http://www.atlantahobby.com/>  has 2 more Thunder power TP-1010C 
>> Chargers IN STOCK.
>>
>>   When used with TP-210V they are supposed to be the best Lipo charge

>> setups! (per TP)
>>
>>     Phone# 678-513-4450
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>   
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion