[NSRCA-discussion] SODA BOTTLE FUEL TANK
Jerry Budd
jerry at buddengineering.com
Thu Feb 16 16:19:45 AKST 2006
I think you meant mass of the fluid.
>It's the density of the fluid, not the volume of the fluid. Dwayne
>
>Eddie Batchelor wrote:
>
>> I've not made any smart comments in a while SO here goes.
>>
>> <That's almost a pound of fuel the airplane must be a light weight.>
>>
>> That'd be closer to a pound and a half. Last time I looked a pound was
>> 16oz (454Gm). SOOO that 33oz bottle that is now 24ozs (full) would be
>> more like a pound and a half, down from the original 2.06pounds it
>> started life as. Of Course if we're gonna get that serious we'd hafta
>> talk about the specific gravity of the fuel - so I'm kinda out on a
>> limb with this
>>
>> But since most of us do take off with a full tank (except those
>> electron guys) Can you feel the difference in a 2m plane changing
>> weight well over a pound, even if it's located on the CofG. At my
>> level of experience, especially since I've not touched the sticks
>> since Hurricane Rita, I'm not gonna voice an opinion. You guys tell me.
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of
>> *jivey61 at bellsouth.net
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:11 PM
>> *To:* NSRCA Mailing List
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SODA BOTTLE FUEL TANK
>>
>> Buddy
>>
>> Ya don't weigh it with full tank,besides that the 160DZ has gobs of power
>>
>> Jim Ivey
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* BUDDYonRC at aol.com <mailto:BUDDYonRC at aol.com>
>>
>> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:54 AM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SODA BOTTLE FUEL TANK
>>
>> In a message dated 2/15/2006 8:35:48 PM Central Standard Time,
>> jivey61 at bellsouth.net <mailto:jivey61 at bellsouth.net> writes:
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> I was getting ready to update my experiment with the 33 oz
>> coke bottle filled with fuel 30%. I let it sit and shrink for
>> 2 months,then when it appeared to stop shrinking I removed the
>> fuel and carefully measured the volume.The bottle started life
>> as 33 oz,1 liter and now holds 24 oz liquid. Which is perfect
>> for a thirsty 160 DZ with a 4 blade prop.I have it in my
>> Smaragd and will fly (test) tomorrow. Should work fine and no
>> more shrinking.
>>
>> Jim Ivey
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* Wayne Galligan <mailto:wgalligan at goodsonacura.com>
>>
>> *To:* NSRCA Mailing List
>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:21 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] SODA BOTTLE FUEL TANK
>>
>> FYI... I had a conversation with a flying friend the other
>> day about the
>> soda bottle fuel tanks and the way they shrink. He happens
>> to work for
>> Pepsi and explained to me that the bottles are blow
>> molded. He said if they
>> are not used with in a certain period of time that the
>> memory in the plastic
>> takes over and they will shrink in size and then they have
>> to discard the
>> old bottles. The carbonized soda keeps the shape of the
>> bottle till used.
>> He said that most likely the nitro content speeds up the
>> process and could
>> explain why some of you using them with higher then 15%
>> nitro are
>> experiencing this phenomenon.
>> So.... drink another one.... rinse and fill.
>>
>> Wayne Galligan
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> Wow Jim
>>
>> That's almost a pound of fuel the airplane must be a light weight.
>>
>> Buddy
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/262 - Release Date: 2/16/2006
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
___________
Jerry Budd
Budd Engineering
(661) 722-5669 Voice/Fax
(661) 435-0358 Cell Phone
mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list