[NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive

[Del K. Rykert]

How absolutely revolting...  to be flying a real 2m pattern ship in February..  and not be in the sun belt.. 
 
                 Del 
          nsrca - 473
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Scott Anderson 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:31 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


  1 inch dusting in Knoxville, TN and going to be 60f on Tuesday.. Might just have to go fly :)

  scott anderson
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Randy hatfield 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:18 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


    I call it a re-use of the dining room.  We had a 12 inch 'dusting' as well in DC.  Black ice everywhere this morning.  I am having fun turing Balsa in to mounds of saw dust.

    Randy
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Dean Pappas 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:50 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


      That's a padded room, right? I call it the workshop.
      Dean

      Dean Pappas 
      Sr. Design Engineer 
      Kodeos Communications 
      111 Corporate Blvd. 
      South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
      (908) 222-7817 phone 
      (908) 222-2392 fax 
      d.pappas at kodeos.com 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
        Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:48 PM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


        Dean,
                   What snow?

        It's only a 12" dusting.....Signed, ex Boston MA inmate....

        You should just "get a room" for yourself and the "tuned-pipe-pundits", then talk 2-c's and pipes until the snow melts! That will keep you all sane!  :-)))) John's RV is vacant right now.....

        Evl-Eric.
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Dean Pappas 
          To: NSRCA Mailing List 
          Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:39 PM
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


          Yeah, John!
          What ever happened to the "obvious to one skilled in the art" clause? 
          Maybe what is patented is the arrangement of servo-box, or extension arm ... in any case, this falls under the heading of re-patenting the wheel.
          Granted, on a 3-D only setup, I'd hook up to the servo this way!

          signed, snow covered in Joisey
          A.K.A.
          Dean Pappas 
          Sr. Design Engineer 
          Kodeos Communications 
          111 Corporate Blvd. 
          South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
          (908) 222-7817 phone 
          (908) 222-2392 fax 
          d.pappas at kodeos.com 
            -----Original Message-----
            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Ferrell
            Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:30 PM
            To: NSRCA Mailing List
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


            If that can be worthy of a patent, the inmates are in charge of the asylum!

            John Ferrell    
            http://DixieNC.US

              ----- Original Message ----- 
              From: Bob Richards 
              To: NSRCA Mailing List 
              Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:08 AM
              Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Direct Servo Drive


              My feeling exactly.

              Bob R.


              Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
                Never have seen it before, but I guess the main question I have concerns the potential for loss of effective torque transmitted to the control surface.  I see that they claim it's better due to no losses.  That would be true in the sense that you don't lose that little bit in the linkage friction etc., but if you only want, say, 25 degrees of surface throw each direction, it would appear that you would have to limit the servo travel to 25 degrees as well.  If that's true, then you have less mechanical advantage for a given degree of movement for the surface, since you would normally have a servo traveling about doub! le that distance.  The control surface speed would be quicker, assuming the load is handled without any blowback or slowdown of movement due to the effectively lower torque transmitted while moving.  Maybe I'm not seeing it right, but it looks like it might not be such a good thing to use, unless you were already planning on having something close to a 1:1 correspondence of degrees of servo arm movement to degrees of surface travel.

                Ed



------------------------------------------------------------------


              _______________________________________________
              NSRCA-discussion mailing list
              NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
              http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------


          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060213/3afd3eb9/attachment-0001.html