[NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS

Emory Schroeter emorydmd at earthlink.net
Mon Feb 6 11:18:13 AKST 2006


Yeah, yeah, Ron. Like some wise person once said, "even a blind squirrel finds a nut once and a while." =)

Emory.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Van Putte 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:29 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS




  On Feb 6, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Scott Dunphy wrote:


    I agree Emory , Pattern needs to get back to fun and we do drive more up here . Last time I checked I didn't get whiped to many times , I can send you some fuel because I don't think there is enuogh in Geogia for you to whip me . Its on again !


  Sheez!  What will that prove?  Even I beat Emory once in a while.


  Ron Van Putte

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Emory Schroeter 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:49 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS


      No biggie, Gary. I understand your concern and look forward to hearing from you and other D3 members on this, and any other subject that needs to be discussed. Always feel free to shot me an email.

      Thanks,
      Emory.
      emorydmd at earthlink.net

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Bill Courtney 
        To: NSRCA Mailing List 
        Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 11:28 PM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS


        EMORY:

          I  APOLOGIZE IF MY WORDS SEEM STRONG ITS NOT ANGER ONLY STRONG CONSERN ON THIS  SUBJECT. I USUALLY DO NOT POST VERY OFTEN BECAUSE I TEND TO RAMBLE SO I TRY TO GET TO THE POINT AS FOR THE CAPS IT HELPS HIDE MY BAD GRAMMER AND BAD ANGLISH!!!!!!!! 

        AGAIN MY APOLOGIES!!!!!!!

        GARY COURTNEY  
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Emory Schroeter 
          To: NSRCA Mailing List 
          Cc: NSRCA District III ; James Woodward ; Cathy Reuther 
          Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 9:25 PM
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS


          Man Gary,

          What's up with all the caps? Aren't we all friends here?

          What I had wanted to try this year was the same setup that we had in years past. I believe that the rule was in effect about 5-6 years ago. We used to allow one out of district contest to count towards our district championship points. Now, I think there are some advantages and disadvantages to this. I feel like this helps our pilots that are on the fringes of our district that may not be able to attend 5 in district contests. This was the reason that I wanted to try this again. The disadvantage could be that since you are not necessarily flying against your district peers in an out of district contest, some people may feel isn't  fair to count these points towards a championship. I assume that would be your view. 

          Now, that being said, I am not too proud to back down on this if people are really upset about this change. You always have to remember that this stuff is supposed to be fun. I did consult with the D3 AVP's and Lamar to get their opinions. With the exception of Lamar, no one had any serious concerns about this. My personal view is that I felt this wouldn't make too much difference at the end of the season. 

          If D3 members would like to contact me, I would prefer that it be to my personal email address so as not to clutter up the NSRCA list. If you like this idea or you don't like it, let me know. I will get a separate, unaffiliated accounting firm to count votes =)

          Sincerely,
          Emory.
          emorydmd at earthlink.net

            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Bill Courtney 
            To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
            Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:10 PM
            Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] dist 3 contest POINTS


             EMORY;
               
             IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT YOU ARE GOING TO LET OUT OF DISTRICT CONTEST POINTS COUNT IN DIST 3. THIS  IN MY OPINION IS A BAD IDEA!!!! IT DEFEATS THE NEED FOR DISTRICTS THIS SHOULD BE PUT TO A VOTE BY THE MEMBERSHIP OF DIST 3 AS A HOLE AND NOT BE A LONE EDICT BY THE DIST. 3 PRES. ALL IN DIST THREE SHOULD BE REPRESENTED  IN ANY MAJOR CHANGE SUCH AS THIS WITH A VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


            GARY COURTNEY






--------------------------------------------------------------------



            _______________________________________________
            NSRCA-discussion mailing list
            NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
            http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



----------------------------------------------------------------------



          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



------------------------------------------------------------------------



        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



--------------------------------------------------------------------------



      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060206/425054e4/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list