[NSRCA-discussion] Cooling outrunners

Dean Pappas d.pappas at kodeos.com
Wed Dec 20 05:38:32 AKST 2006


Hi Chad,
Yes everything gets better when you don't have to run at peak load very often.
Hey ... that's how the best wet setups work too.
If I can get the motor temps down without too much fuss, I always will:
not just the magnets, but the bearings and gearboxes like it too.
I am still waiting to see what happens long term with outrunner bearings.

Why? In the CL Stunt setups, the first couple of tries with planetary gearboxes were ALL abject failures.
Gearboxes were failing in literally a handful of flights. Stunt ships corner hard (maybe 90 degrees in 1/3 second)
and we are currently seeing everything from ~80 flights to >300 flights before outrunner bearing problems start.

Back to RC and heat.
I block 50% of the air to the battery (one cheek inlet) with a foam rubber plug on
days under 70 F (~20 C) and at maybe 55 F (15 C) I take a piece of tape and cover half of the remaining inlet.
That allows me to keep my 5300s up to maybe 95 ~ 100F on cool days. 
I typically get a 40 F (20 C) rise on warm days with everything opened up.
I am also on the throttle a bit more on hot days.
The Extremes will be welcome in that regard.

later

Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Chad
Northeast
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:37 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cooling outrunners


Hi Dean

Quite true about the magnets, but I have flown with my motor at 150F and 
on days where it doesnt get above 65F....I can not tell the difference 
in performance, probably because there is such excess power in these 
setups to start with.

Pack temperature on the other hand is very important, OAT below 10-15C I 
have to start restricting cooling on the batteries or they dont get warm 
enough to provide good power.  The new extreme packs are better about 
this than the Prolites, but still very noticeable on certain days.

Chad

Dean Pappas wrote:
> Bob, you're a genius!
> I suggested this to an E-powered CL Stunt buddy in the Netherlands 
> some months ago because the Stunt guys have a long history of styling 
> planes with chin scoops placed far back. These often require a 3/4" 
> long prop drive extension to place the cylinder back farther, and the 
> use of a short venturi. They cowl much easier than computer carbs!
>  
> Hi Chad,
> Makes you wonder what some of these guys were thinking when they 
> placed the cooling and cheek inlets. ?? **^^$$!!!
> The inlet airbox can shroud the aft end of the motor and the sleeve 
> dump into a front exit plenumm. Now the trick is the exit from there. 
> I think that a big elbow like a turbopropo exhaust would be cool, as 
> would be cheek cowls with no entry holes just exits. The exit plenum 
> just behind the spinner would have to duct into the cheeks. Notre that 
> flying without a spinner will wreck the cooling! A row of exhaust 
> stacks like a P-51 could be boxed in and used to suck the warm air out 
> of the exit plenum. I need to draw a picture. That'll take a while, 
> especially around Christmas.
>  
> The colder the magnets are, the stronger they are, and the less 
> resistive the copper is, so cooler is always better for the motor. The 
> same is true for the ESC: MOSFETs are less resistive the cooler they 
> are, so everything gets better in the Antarctic except battery 
> performance.
>  
> later,
>     Dean
>  
>  
>
> Dean Pappas
> Sr. Design Engineer
> Kodeos Communications
> 111 Corporate Blvd.
> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
> (908) 222-7817 phone
> (908) 222-2392 fax
> d.pappas at kodeos.com
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>     [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of
>     *Bob Richards
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:27 AM
>     *To:* chad at f3acanada.org; NSRCA Mailing List
>     *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cooling outrunners
>
>     Is there any reason why you can't duct the air to blow into the
>     rear of the motor, and provide a way for it to escape from the front?
>      
>     Geez, I'm just thinking that leaving the spinner off, or use a
>     really small spinner, would be the way to go.
>      
>     Bob R.
>
>
>     */Chad Northeast <chad at f3acanada.org>/* wrote:
>
>         The problem with a lot of composite fuse models (Twister
>         included) is
>         that the inlets in the chin and cheeks are often right at the
>         rear or
>         even behind an outrunner.....so ducting toward them is very
>         difficult.
>         I have to agree that a proper ducting system is crucial for
>         cooling. I
>         use a very simple short radius 90 bend in a peice of depron
>         that pulls
>         air in from the chin, I see about a 20C rise in temp without
>         it, other
>         than that I dont really do anything special. The motor will
>         operate at
>         up to 170F without complaining so as long as its 20-30F below
>         that all
>         is good :)
>
>         Chad
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list