[NSRCA-discussion] YS 160 wanted

[Ron Filteau]

Jim

I have tried the email address for a ys 160.

I have a brand new 160 in the box for sale.

Ron Filteau

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jim Woodward
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:10 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] YS 160 wanted

Hi Guys,

If someone has a YS 160 they want to get rid of please email me off line
at jim.woodward at armorlholdings.com

Thanks,
Jim W. 


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van
Putte
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:52 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA


On Dec 13, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Steven.Homenda at ctcplc.com wrote:

> The new landing rule indicates "landing is not a centered manuever and
> there is no downgrade for displacement to the left or right from  
> center as
> long as the landing is in the landing zone."  It goes on to state "  
> if the
> touchdown is within the runway but not in the landing zone it  
> should be
> downgraded proportionate to the distance outside the landing  
> zone."   In my
> opinion,   relying on each judge to accurately guesstimate the  
> distance
> outside the landing zone's perpendicular lines which are 15 meters (50
> feet) to the right and left of center (of pilot), then subtracting,  
> say,
> one-half point for each 1.5 meter infraction before scoring the  
> maneuver,
> is somewhat complicated.

Yes, but so is trying to figure out which radii are different from  
the standard in a square loop or a square eight, when you're not  
supposed to determine what the standard is until the end of the  
maneuver.

  Now consider this: The new criteria for judging radii in these  
maneuvers in F3A for 2007/2008 is that the standard is set by the  
first radius.  For a long time now, we have eventually adopted the  
F3A rules interpretations. I wonder how long will it be before ANA  
rules will reflect this interpretation.

Ron

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and proprietary information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient(s),
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion