[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Pattern Rules posted by AMA
JonLowe at aol.com
JonLowe at aol.com
Tue Dec 12 19:21:57 AKST 2006
Hey, we ain't IMAC, re: snaps! And certainly not the Tucson Shootout. I've
never seen such exaggerated pitch breaks in my life! 20 degree pitch breaks
before any rotation. I think 5 points for AMA is severe, but doesn't kill you
if you don't have a break.
As I read the landing rule, landing outside the zone is a proportionate
downgrade. If you land less than 1.5 meters outside the zone (5% of the 30 meter
zone), that is a 1/2 point downgrade, 3 meters or less is 1 point, etc. You'd
have to land 30 meters from the line to get a zero just from this flaw. Do
the rubber o-ring tires on MK tailwheels count as a part? ;)
I'm also reading that the 2 of 4 going into the split s (intermediate
sequence) requires you to pull immediately after reaching the 2nd point. This was
the way I thought it should be, but some were arguing that you had to hesitate
after the 2nd point the same amount as you did between the points, then pull.
Jon
In a message dated 12/12/2006 9:59:49 PM Central Standard Time,
jshulman at cfl.rr.com writes:
I guess we can't zero snaps for not having a pitch break...lol. RCA-20, right
side.
And the landing zone is essentially a 30m box. But it is not a 0 if you don't
land in it, just a downgrade. But don't go knocking parts off of it, or it'll
become a 0. RCA-26
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
Jon Lowe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061213/54099e75/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list