[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Rules interpretation

[Glenn Hatfield]

Hopefully I wont feel like running away when judging landings anymore.  I had a hard time seeing how fast we got so 'relaxed'.  Sometimes it felt like a spear the judge contest.

Randy

--- jshulman at cfl.rr.com wrote:

From: "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Rules interpretation
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:10:07 -0500

Steve,

Don't tell anyone the lines were to close, we'll have the best landing
District in the States next year...lol.

It was very interesting to see the pilots that made it a "point" to land in
the zone without care for the plane. Thankfully no major accidents on
landing happened. It really was an eye-opener to see how "relaxed" we've
become at take-offs and landings since they've stopped being judged. I'm
glad to see it back.

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
Steven.Homenda at ctcplc.com
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:26 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Rules interpretation



The landing zone question was posed to several different people and in
several different forums.   Feedback received indicated the landing zone
was 30 meters, 15 meters to the left and to the right of center.    The
lines were painted in white the Friday before the contest and the "landing
zone" was announced during at the pilot's meeting on Saturday, prior to the
start of the contest at which time I interpreted the "landing zone" to mean
the aircraft must land somewhere inside the zone, then roll out under
control for at least 15 meters before completion of maneuver.      I asked
for questions.    To my knowledge, only question asked concerned whether
aircraft must initiate ground roll and takeoff within the 30 meter zone.
Since this was an AMA santioned contest, in preparation, I downloaded the
2005 AMA Rules for Radio Control Pattern, available from the NSRCA website.
Reference is made to AMA RC Pattern Judges' Guide, Part D. Judging
individual maneuvers, #10. which states:  "The following is a collation of
all mandatory zero (0) scores applicable to all Pattern Classes:   10.
Landing outside of runway or landing zone lateral boundary."

My interpretation of the feedback received, fresh lines painted on the
runway and discussion at the pilot's meeting prior to the start of the
contest dictated my decision on this issue.    At no time during the
competition did I sense that my decision to enforce the 30 meter landing
zone posed a safety hazard to anyone near the flight line, nor was I
approached by anyone about safety issues as they pertained to the
enforcement of the landing zone given the wind conditions experienced by
all of those who competed.

After the contest, further review of the AMA Guide spells out "Landing Zone
" in amongst Part E., Description of Maneuvers.   To my surprise, it
appears the landing zone should have been: "two lines placed perpendicular
across the runway and spaced 100 meters apart, or 50 meters to the left and
right of center."   Further, "the width of the landing zone shall normally
be the width of the runway but in no case shall exceed 30 meters."

As CD of the event this past weekend, I take full responsibility of my
actions as respect those of you who may have been judged unfairly on this
particular issue, however with the same breath, I do not believe the final
decision made at the time had an adverse effect on any of the standings.
If anyone has any other information to the contrary, please feel free to
advise me at once since I'm on my way to the closest home improvement
center for a gallon of black paint and paper towels to wipe the egg off my
face..........

Sincerely,
Steve Homenda

--------------------------------------------------------------
For full details of the services the CTC group provides please
visit our website at  www.CharlesTaylorConsulting.com

This email (including all attachments) is confidential and may
be protected by legal privilege.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or
disclose its contents to anyone else.  If you have received it
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system.

We monitor the content of emails sent and received via our
network for viruses and unauthorised use, we recommend that
you should also check messages for viruses in accordance with
good computing practice.

Emails sent to or from our systems are not confidential to any
named individual and we reserve the right to read them without
prior notice.
--------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 12/9/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 12/9/2006


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion