[NSRCA-discussion] ZN and Composite ARF Partnership

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Indeed they do, Dean. Form follows function....a classic example of the age old axiom. 
 
Not so surprising is the fact that they pretty much all have similar flight character and I still believe the collective design isn't as perfected as it should be for full flight regime. 
 
Matt 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: d.pappas at kodeos.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] ZN and Composite ARF Partnership


Don't all modern Pattern designs look alike?
Dean P.

    -----Original Message----- 
    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org on behalf of Zoro1024 at aol.com 

    Sent: Tue 8/22/2006 10:27 PM 
    To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
    Cc: 
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] ZN and Composite ARF Partnership
    
    
    Went over and put the canopy on my Impulse, real close to a clone, except 
for I can't tell if the belly pan is removeable on the Integral.  Nice looking 
plane though.
     
     
    Mike


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060823/89710484/attachment-0001.html