[NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?

[Mike Hester]

Yes.

I ran it in a G-Brick a few years ago.

The top end was really powerful for it's size, not all that far below an OS 
140. It actually ran very similar, except for one problem: the idle was iffy 
at best. I could never get a consistent idle. It would idle ok about 2500 
rpm, but no lower. Any less and it was prone to dying. I managed to get the 
idle down for a while, but then sold it.

I used an OS F plug, 15% Cool power, and filtered the crap out of the fuel.

It just didn't like to idle, and from speaking with others at the time, this 
was a common problem. That has been a few years ago, so maybe they worked it 
out? And then again maybe not.....

-Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; 
<patternrules at earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?


> Okee-dokee then!  Anyone have any experience running it?
>
> Ed
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
> To: <patternrules at earthlink.net>; "NSRCA Mailing List"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 11:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?
>
>
>> Yup,
>> Mike Stokes drove the development of that engine back when everyone was
>> still thinking in terms of a 120 displacement.
>>
>>
>> Dean Pappas
>> Sr. Design Engineer
>> Kodeos Communications
>> 111 Corporate Blvd.
>> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
>> (908) 222-7817 phone
>> (908) 222-2392 fax
>> d.pappas at kodeos.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Steven
>> Maxwell
>> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 11:43 AM
>> To: NSRCA Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?
>>
>>
>> One of the guys in my club is using TT 120 rear in a Focus haven't tuned
>> the pipe yet and flys the sportsman fine.
>>
>> Steven Maxwell
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com>
>>> To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Date: 8/21/2006 9:20:14 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thunder Tiger made a rear exhaust pumped 1.20 2c a few years ago that
>> looked
>>> very familiar. Never saw one anywhere!?
>>>
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>>> >From: "Ed  Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
>>> >Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> >To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?
>>> >Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 04:47:17 -0400
>>> >
>>> >Err, sorry - typo on my part.  It's 1.75M (70")
>>> >   ----- Original Message -----
>>> >   From: colin chariandy
>>> >   To: NSRCA Mailing List
>>> >   Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 11:06 AM
>>> >   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2C 1.20 choices?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   1.5M....so we are talking about a 59" patterm airplane. If it's 
>>> > built
>>> >with a tunnel and weighs less than 7lbs I would love to see a YS 61AR 
>>> >or
>> OS
>>> >61Rear used. I'm sure almost everyone has one of those engines on their
>>> >shelf and would enjoy running them again.
>>> >
>>> >   Colin.
>>> >
>>> >   Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >     In the next few weeks, I will be testing out a new 1.5M Pattern
>> design
>>> >that will be coming out as an ARF / ARC.  I'm getting one, the
>>> >designer/manufacturer will have the other pre-production model.  My
>> first
>>> >thought was to put an OS 1.20 AX on it, which at first seems like a no
>>> >brainer.  However I would like to avoid the side exhaust, wrap around
>>> >header thing.  I could just hang the stock muffler off it, but I would
>> like
>>> >to see if there other choices to consider out there.  Any rear exhaust,
>> 2C
>>> >solutions for this size range?
>>> >
>>> >     Thanks
>>> >
>>> >     Ed
>>> >
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> >     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>>> >   All new Yahoo! Mail -
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>>> >   Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   _______________________________________________
>>> >   NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> >   NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >   http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> >_______________________________________________
>>> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion