[NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Masters... clarify on Item20

rcmaster199 at aol.com rcmaster199 at aol.com
Tue Aug 15 14:21:36 AKDT 2006


Jim
 
As he should have (BG). Don't know if it's "kin to hotdogging", but it has been stated that once in the box, everything is judged. There are no "dead zones" in the box. And BTW, we have all done that at one time or nother.
 
As far as 30 ft movement with rudder application, (aka--Maneuver Smoother), that's the whole point of pattern, isn't it? If the judge didn't see it, IT DIDN'T happen.
 
Matt
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: jivey61 at bellsouth.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Masters... clarify on Item20


Terry
 I tried that with Lamar Blair judging one time and he hammered me good.He says it is not smooth nor precision and kin to hotdogging.
I finished the first maneuver with a straight line exit and rolled the plane 60 degrees and repositioned it to make the next entry line and maneuver and was downgraded.
However you can move your plane with rudder 30 plus feet in or out and get away with it.It's not as visible.
Duhh?
Jim Ivey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Terry Brox 
To: NSRCA Mailing List 
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2007 Masters... clarify on Item20


Would that mean that the "dead" zone between the exit line of one maneuver and the entry line of another, if there is sufficient distance, could be used to reposition the craft on a new heading. In othere words, turn 90 degrees to the flight path then back 90 degrees as to move out or in if necessary? From this, one would assume the "dead" zone should not be judged. 
 
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060815/39060055/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list