[NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???

[adriancwong at earthlink.net]

I have the feeling one of the main reason why YS is coming out with the 170 is because Onda is flying the Nalar bipe, and needed more power for the F sequence. I agree the 160 has more than enough power for the P sequence.

As far as I know, the 170 shares the same design with the 160 but with a bigger bore.

Adrian

-----Original Message-----
>From: vicenterc at comcast.net
>Sent: Aug 13, 2006 7:46 PM
>To: adriancwong at earthlink.net, NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???
>
>I have the following questions:
>
>1.  Do we really need more power than the YS 160 DZ for pattern?  Please don't tell me that "more power is always better".  I know that one.  Probably, it is required for some F3A maneuvers and I don't know because I don't fly F3A.
>
>2.  Is the YS 170 a complete new redesign?  If not, I assume that YS is using the same components of the YS 160 DZ.  If that is the case, I will wonder how the same mechanical parts are going to take the additional forces of the more powerful engine.  I am sure that YS have been doing research and testing.
>
>Regards,
>
>Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
>-------------- Original message -------------- 
>From: adriancwong at earthlink.net 
>
>> 170 should start production in early 07. YS is trying to finish fulfilling the 
>> back orders of the 160. 
>> 
>> Believe me, the motor is powerful, even more so than the 160. I've seen two of 
>> them ran at a contest two weeks ago, scary power. 
>> 
>> Adrian 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> >From: Adam Glatt 
>> >Sent: Aug 13, 2006 6:18 PM 
>> >To: NSRCA Mailing List 
>> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ??? 
>> > 
>> >As an electric guy who has seen the YS 170 in two big competitions now 
>> >(France WC and 06 Muncie), I believe the 170 can be used to fly pattern 
>> >just as well as any electric motor. The pattern will look a little 
>> >different, of course, but it can be just as good or better: see Onda and 
>> >CPLR. 
>> >-Adam 
>> > 
>> >Koenig, Tom wrote: 
>> >> Hello again Pattern world, 
>> >> 
>> >> Since everyone is talking about electric power these days-I thought 
>> >> I'd throw out this question. 
>> >> 
>> >> Is there a new YS being planned that anyone knows of or is testing? Troy? 
>> >> 
>> >> I don't believe the 170 is slated for release, nor do I believe this 
>> >> will be an adequate 'competitor' for the current generation of 'E' 
>> >> power plants. I would have thought Yamada San would need to work on 
>> >> something that would blow our socks off. The OS 200 4 stroke is 
>> >> supposed to be on its way-but so is Christmas!! 
>> >> 
>> >> Anyone in the know? 
>> >> 
>> >> Tom 
>> >> ************************************************************************ 
>> >> *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may 
>> >> be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
>> >> copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
>> >> dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
>> >> prohibited without the consent of the sender. 
>> >> 
>> >> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep 
>> >> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
>> >> is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
>> >> Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
>> >> viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
>> >> affected attachments. 
>> >> 
>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
>> >> individual sender, except where the sender expressly, 
>> >> and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
>> >> organisation. 
>> >> ************************************************************************ 
>> >> 
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>> >> 
>> >> _______________________________________________ 
>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
>> >> 
>> >_______________________________________________ 
>> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion