[NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats

wgalligan wgalligan at goodsonacura.com
Fri Aug 4 05:43:30 AKDT 2006


Ron,

Thats what sump pumps and dehumidifiers are for.  Built many a plane in the basement where it was nice and toasty during those hard Iowa winters with -20 degree January's. 
One of the reasons why I got to D6 as fast as I could.

Wayno
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Van Putte 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 8:32 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats




  On Aug 4, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Grow Pattern wrote:


    Probably because they don't have to live in heated basements for 2/5 of the year!!!!

    "Permafrost" is what they have on a doughnut!


  Basement?  I've heard of those.  Aren't they kinda like caves?  Aren't they cold and moldy?  Don't they leak and need to be pumped out?  Just asking.


  Ron Van Putte
  Fort Walton Beach, Florida


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: John Pavlick 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:02 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats


      Why is everyone is from (AMA) D5 or D6? Maybe I should move out there...

      John Pavlick
      http://www.idseng.com
        

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
        Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:24 AM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] You, at the Nats


        Jason,
                     Just for fun, and never being one to shy away from a challenge, here are the conceptual team champions for all of the classes that I could calculate.
        This is just to show you (all) what could be done to add some excitement for those who do not always make it to the podium.
        This is only for fun and is not mathematically confirmed/accurate. It is only based upon the names of the top few pilots who also gave me data sheets. I cross referenced their AMA districts. (Interestingly enough, some top pilots did not know to which AMA district they belonged to!)  This should really be calculated by adding up the top three sets of pilot-points per district,  but I had no option other than to use the highest positions.

        AMA District Team Champions
        Intermediate Team Champs
        Position     Name                           District
        5.               Gary Courtney             D-5
        6.               Jon Lowe                     D-5
        9.               Robert Green               D-5
        Advanced Team Champs
        Position     Name                           District
        1.               Brett Wickizer             D-6
        4.               Keith Black                 D-6
        7.               Chris Moon                 D-6
        Masters Team Champs
        Position     Name                           District
        1.               Ryan McLaughlin        D-5
        3.               A.C. Glen                    D-5
        4.               John Fuqua                  D-5
         FAI - Not enough prelims info readily available or district id’s to calculate three pilots.
        As an FYI guys for next year….., IL, TX, AZ, OH and AR 
        are not AMA Districts!!!!!!!!!
        Just for you Jason, and as another FYI for everyone else -
        FAI progression was as follows for the top 5;
        End of P-07           End of Semis F-07                  Finals 
        Jason                     Sean                                        QuiQue
        Sean                      Quique                                    Chip
        QuiQue                  Jason                                       Jason
        Chip                      Don                                          Don
        Don                       Chip                                        Sean
        Most interesting how the unknowns sorts it all out - Hamm?


        I could see a future where a couple of pilots encourage a third or fourth pilot to attend the Nat's so that they would have a team of three and therefore stand a chance of winning the Nationals team award for their class.


        Regards,


        Eric. 
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: JShulman 
          To: NSRCA Mailing List 
          Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:03 PM
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] me, at the Nats


          Eric,

          I don't think it's unfair to ask George about this. There is no need to define a "team" or what the "team" would be flying against. There were 8 finalists (even though one was a Canadian) that flew well enough to be in the finals, and I would just like to see how we did in the P-07. Remember, the Team at the Worlds is determined by P-07, and hypothetically looking at P-07 we would see who did the best (in George's eye) in P-07. Again, please remember, this is all for FUN and nothing more.

          Also, when are you going to have the District results for us Eric... it's only Excel...lol.

          Regards,
          Jason
          www.jasonshulman.com
          www.shulmanaviation.com
          www.composite-arf.com 

            -----Original Message-----
            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
            Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:09 PM
            To: NSRCA Mailing List
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] me, at the Nats


            Jason,

            Ref. "Hey George, if you feel like it, how about posting the results of the Finalists P-07 rounds? See how a "Team" would have done."
                       
            It's a bit unfair to ask Georgie to do that because he can't do it unless you, a) define a team and,  b) define what teams that team would be flying against.

            At one time I was hoping that we would have District team awards in our FAI prelims and in each of the other classes.  It would have been great to see which districts won a "National" team title. It did not have to be an AMA award but just like our district individual District champions it would have added a nice flavor. I think it was a wee bit too radical at the time.

            You could do it now. All you have to do is add up the top three scores from each district in each class. You could do it in Excel in about four minutes if you had the results files and plugged in a district column. 

            One for Rusty Dose perhaps?

            Regards,

            Eric.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------



      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060804/3448c5b9/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list