[NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum

[Jay Marshall]

That's why I suggested dual links, Jon. Admittedly, I am not much of a cell
phone user and therefore I have never had a dropped call. Range checks take
on a whole new meaning.

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
jonlowe at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:45 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum

How many dropped calls have you had on a cell phone?  How many 
bad/noisy/garbled connections?  How many out of range/no signal issues?

Not for me!!

Jon Lowe

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:32:03 -0400
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum

Now that I am receiving again, I'll throw this out and shake things up.

Many cell phones have data ports. Why not attach an encoder from a TX 
box to
one, and then a phone & decoder in the aircraft? No interference, 
infinite
channels, infinite range. A little more weight but not too much if you 
use
the aircraft battery. Perhaps dual links for fail-safe? And how about
telemetry on the down link? Someone will say that the FCC would oppose 
this,
but all we are doing is sending data from one FCC approved phone to 
another.


Jay Marshall
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion