[NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum

Scott Anderson scott at rcfoamy.com
Tue Apr 11 10:48:11 AKDT 2006


Hmm go Verizon   <VBG>

Scott Anderson
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <jonlowe at aol.com>
To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum


> How many dropped calls have you had on a cell phone?  How many 
> bad/noisy/garbled connections?  How many out of range/no signal issues?
> 
> Not for me!!
> 
> Jon Lowe
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Sent: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:32:03 -0400
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ultimate Spread Spectrum
> 
> Now that I am receiving again, I'll throw this out and shake things up.
> 
> Many cell phones have data ports. Why not attach an encoder from a TX 
> box to
> one, and then a phone & decoder in the aircraft? No interference, 
> infinite
> channels, infinite range. A little more weight but not too much if you 
> use
> the aircraft battery. Perhaps dual links for fail-safe? And how about
> telemetry on the down link? Someone will say that the FCC would oppose 
> this,
> but all we are doing is sending data from one FCC approved phone to 
> another.
> 
> 
> Jay Marshall
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list