Roll coupling #2

[Steven Maxwell]

 Sorry abouit that I was trying to change some Spam filters and have chaged it back.
 Steve     patternrules


----- Original Message ----- 
From: John Ferrell 
To: discussion
Sent: 9/20/2005 12:21:27 PM 
Subject: Re: Roll coupling #2


I received the following message when I replied All to the list. The associated link does not work. 
I believe it would be considerably more polite to just dump them at the received end rather than spam the well meaning responder. 

"I apologize for this automatic reply to your email.


To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I have approved beforehand. 


If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you, I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience. 


Click the link below to fill out the request:


https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=patternrules@earthlink.net&id=1ehKL91EX3Nl34h0

"

John Ferrell    
http://DixieNC.US

----- Original Message ----- 
From: John Ferrell 
To: patternrules at earthlink.net ; discussion 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Roll coupling #2


Dave Guerin did a lot experimenting with rudder size and shape as well as experimenting with the rudder hinge angle on the Prodigy. None of these made any real noticeable change in the air.

Of course a different airframe might yield different results. The Prodigy was an anhedral wing version of the Prophecy. It flew like the Prophecy but the wing made it strange to look at. I have one ready to install equipment in, but will not likely get there soon...

John Ferrell    
http://DixieNC.US

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Steven Maxwell 
To: discussion 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Roll coupling #2


 I ask this question the other day and got a few replies, all dealing with dihedral, with one exception. Seems that there could be and is much more to this. #1 Could the wing be moved up or down instead of dihedral? 2# Couldn't the rudder size and position,  sub fin added or reduced? Sense the 2 piece wing offers less possiblities of changing dihedral than the old one piece wing.
 Designers?
 Please reply to all and remove the sender.
Thanks 


Steven Maxwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050920/aa5d9467/attachment-0001.html