Icepoint/Hyde Mount and a Fall Tale

Keith Black tkeithb at comcast.net
Sun May 15 20:05:39 AKDT 2005


> Bob, I believe you need more up elevator. 



Bill, at first I wasn't sure if you were talking about the Icepoint or the Bobnastics tripping episode ;-)

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: William C. Harden 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:57 PM
  Subject: RE: Icepoint/Hyde Mount


  Bob,

   

  I believe you need more up elevator.  I hate those mushy, rock the wings back and forth, just don't want to break spins.  More elevator throw has always helped me in this scenario; used elevator dual rate to achieve it.

   

  Bill

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
  Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:31 PM
  To: NSRCA
  Subject: Icepoint/Hyde Mount

   

  I promised interested folks a report.

  This is a really good setup.  Very quiet.  The mount moves a LOT, but my pipe mount moves right along, so it seems to be doing fine.  With the three blader, it is REALLY quiet in the air, and I don't have any thrust issues like I was with the MK.  Plus, the vibration is WAY down compared to the MK.

   

  This is a darn good airplane.  Having some spin challenges (doesn't want to break, sort of mushes at the stall, starts as a spiral - ALL ZEROES), but EVERYTHING else is really very good.  The 8" CG seems okay, although it seems to be a bit more pitchy on KE than I expected.  With 15 degrees of elev, I'm needing about 4% mix.

   

  Rolls very well, verticals are solid and straight.  Snaps stop VERY rapidly, no over-rotation at all. Low speed handling better than my Arresti, and it was DARN good.  Must be that HUGE wing out there....

      Anyway - I'm open to suggestions on spins.....anyone???


  Bob Pastorello
  www.rcaerobats.net
  rcaerobob at cox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050516/0a40c042/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list