6 meter interference - channel 03

Tue Mar 22 10:24:15 AKST 2005

Ivey

Aren't you supposed to be working???  Isn't Bill Gates' spellchecker
suppose to be intuitive?  I guess Bill doesn't watch football, or none
of this would have happened.

Steve Byrum 

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Ivey
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:17 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03

 Steve
Open mouth insert paw.Funny who might be listening.

Jim Ivey
> 
> From: "spbyrum" <spbyrum at hiwaay.net>
> Date: 2005/03/22 Tue PM 01:55:24 EST
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> 
> Thank you, Sir. I stand chastised.
> 
> Steve Byrum 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:52 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> 
> (Ok..I know it's only a typo, and it's a low blow...but I have too...
I
> really have too...)
> 
> To set an example for people that can't spell "Pound". :)
> 
> -M
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of spbyrum
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:43 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> 
> That could open an ENTIRELY different discussion.  Cleveland is not
> referred to as "the Mistake by the Lake" for no reason.  Why would
even
> remotely civilized folks act like the "Dog Pond"?
> 
> Steve Byrum 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:25 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> 
> No...Lol...that was Cleveland...and it was the River that caught fire.
> Thanks for the attempted defense though...
> 
> Normally we (Clevelander's) would use Toledo as the low spot with
which
> to elevate our pride...but alas...most of you have fond memories of
that
> fair town.  So we pick on Pittsburgh instead.
> 
> -M
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:15 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> 
> 
> On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Atwood, Mark wrote:
> 
> > Cleveland...  NO comments from the peanut gallery either...Eric this
> > means you. :)
> 
> Well geez!  Coulda been worse; coulda been Erie, PA.  I think that was

> where the lake caught fire. <VBG>
> 
> Ron Van Putte
> 
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> > On Behalf Of Richard Strickland
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:25 AM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> >
> > Where ARE you guys?
> >
> > Richard
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> >
> >
> >> Digital Tv.  Local channel 02 has basically wiped out our 53mhz
band
> >> completely.  The FCC and the station are both aware that they're
> >> broadcasting outside their boundries, but given the aggressiveness
> > with
> >> which they want Digital TV up and running, the FCC has stated that
> > they
> >> will be lenient for a period of time to get things in order.  The
> >> station has been forthcoming with admitting that their bleeding
over,
> >> but have yet to invest in the equipment needed to prevent it. It'll
> >> probably be a few years I'm told.
> >>
> >> Not sure if the same could be happening to 50mhz...  But that's the
> >> story on the 53 bands here.
> >>
> >> -Mark
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> >> On Behalf Of Paul Horan
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:31 AM
> >> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >> Subject: 6 meter interference - channel 03
> >>
> >>     I am getting interference on Channel 03 , 50.86  Mhz.
> >> The 50 mhz rc frequencies are in the CW portion 50-50.100 6meters.
> >> My symptoms were a few holds, plane did no fly smoothly, and 2
> > failsafes
> >> - low throttle.
> >> Any ideas what are the best channels on 6 meters to stay away from
> >> interference ?  Of course, one
> >> solution is to go to the regular RC freqs.
> >>     Any ideas if this interference can be due to some other cause ?
> >> ThanksPaul Horan
> >> KC5NF
> >> AMA 57131
> >> NSRCA 3606
> >> =================================================
> >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> >> To be removed from this list, go to
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> >> and follow the instructions.
> >>
> >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> >> To be removed from this list, go to
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> >> and follow the instructions.
> >>
> >
> > =================================================
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to 
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> > ================================================To access the email 
> > archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to 
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> 
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.