6 meter interference - channel 03

[Pete Cosky]

I try......can't wait to see what sequence you call for me.

;-)

Pete
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:45
Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03


Wow Pete...that has to be the biggest...and the subtlest "slam" we've 
gotten!!  Touché

Remind me to call the wrong sequence for you this summer...

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On 
Behalf Of Pete Cosky
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:34 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: 6 meter interference - channel 03

Those of us from Pittsburgh don't mind being picked on by Cleveland......

Pete

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:24
Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03


No...Lol...that was Cleveland...and it was the River that caught fire.
Thanks for the attempted defense though...

Normally we (Clevelander's) would use Toledo as the low spot with which
to elevate our pride...but alas...most of you have fond memories of that
fair town.  So we pick on Pittsburgh instead.

-M


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:15 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: 6 meter interference - channel 03


On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Atwood, Mark wrote:

> Cleveland...  NO comments from the peanut gallery either...Eric this
> means you. :)

Well geez!  Coulda been worse; coulda been Erie, PA.  I think that was
where the lake caught fire. <VBG>

Ron Van Putte

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Richard Strickland
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:25 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: 6 meter interference - channel 03
>
> Where ARE you guys?
>
> Richard
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:12 AM
> Subject: RE: 6 meter interference - channel 03
>
>
>> Digital Tv.  Local channel 02 has basically wiped out our 53mhz band
>> completely.  The FCC and the station are both aware that they're
>> broadcasting outside their boundries, but given the aggressiveness
> with
>> which they want Digital TV up and running, the FCC has stated that
> they
>> will be lenient for a period of time to get things in order.  The
>> station has been forthcoming with admitting that their bleeding over,
>> but have yet to invest in the equipment needed to prevent it. It'll
>> probably be a few years I'm told.
>>
>> Not sure if the same could be happening to 50mhz...  But that's the
>> story on the 53 bands here.
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>> On Behalf Of Paul Horan
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:31 AM
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> Subject: 6 meter interference - channel 03
>>
>>     I am getting interference on Channel 03 , 50.86  Mhz.
>> The 50 mhz rc frequencies are in the CW portion 50-50.100 6meters.
>> My symptoms were a few holds, plane did no fly smoothly, and 2
> failsafes
>> - low throttle.
>> Any ideas what are the best channels on 6 meters to stay away from
>> interference ?  Of course, one
>> solution is to go to the regular RC freqs.
>>     Any ideas if this interference can be due to some other cause ?
>> ThanksPaul Horan
>> KC5NF
>> AMA 57131
>> NSRCA 3606
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> ================================================To access the email
> archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

================To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.



=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

================To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.



=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.