PCM lock out servo mvt

richard.lewis richard.lewis at idmcontrols.com
Fri Mar 11 07:56:35 AKST 2005


I know a number of guys who have "experiemented" with the rotating wings
and/or ejecting the wings entirely....VBG :)

...The results I have seen have been less than appealing

Richard
  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Keith Hoard
  Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:49 AM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: RE: PCM lock out servo mvt


  Why stop there?  Rig the wings to rotate on the wing tube!!!







  Keith L. Hoard

  Cordova, TN

  khoard at midsouth.rr.com








----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
  Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:23 AM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: PCM lock out servo mvt



  What about having the ailerons in the spoiler position and full up
elevator?



  WG

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com

    To: discussion at nsrca.org

    Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:10 AM

    Subject: Re: PCM lock out servo mvt



    I have tried the "Dethermalizer" command on a Funtana 90. This model is
set up for extreme flight and has 50 degrees up elevator.



    Essentially I put the plane in a Harrier and tried controlling the
oscillations in the usual way. Then I decide to not use rudder and aileron,
only elevator. Oddly enough, the oscillations didn't really get that much
worse and the model didn't flip on its back, an unexpected result. It still
oscillates hard at only 50 degrees of throw and it would likely catch a wing
tip if brought down that way.



    Maybe what is really needed for real dethermalized flight is elevator
command at closer to 90 degrees or possibly having the whole stabilizer flip
up. Kinda what Burt Rutan's team did with their re-entry spacecraft.



    Matt



    PS- What IS this SPAM, SPAM and more SPAM we keep seeing in the subject
lines.



    In a message dated 3/11/2005 10:20:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
natpenton at centurytel.net writes:

      Dean, Great idea ! Some airplanes are more stable in inverted Elevator
than
      upright. All of those who have enough elevator to Elevator need to try
it
      and report. Maybe no more crashes <BG>!!!!                         Nat

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
      To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
      Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:43 AM
      Subject: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: PCM lock out servo mvt


      > Hi Nat,
      > You mean a Pattern ship dethermalizer?
      > Has anyone gotten their 3-D ship to Elevator hands-off? By
      > hands-off, I mean absolutely no rudder or aileron corrections needed
in
      > order to hit the ground flat.
      > I haven't seen it yet.
      > Regards,
      > Dean


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050311/3015000c/attachment-0001.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list