Three blade size

[Mark Hunt]

That is notable....3 blades instead of two and yet one ounce lighter than the apc!

Sounds like a good prop for the 160fx??

Mark
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wayne Galligan 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:53 PM
  Subject: Re: Three blade size


  Something different.   Look like clones.    But I think for less $$
  This 16x11 3 blade has good performance and is noticeably slower then the 17x12 2-blade APC.   
  The 3 blade 16x11 is one ounce lighter then the 17x12 APC also.

  Wayne G


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Mike Hester 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:45 PM
    Subject: Re: Three blade size


    Those look a LOT like Mejlik props, wierdly enough even the sizing is the same. What's up with that?

    Anyway I have a Mejlik 16x11 I tested yesterday. It has an extremely wide blade root and a 120 cut  TT was too small to fit. Also the hole Dia is 3/8 so a bushing would need to be used on a 140. I can say this...it's louder than the APC, but it's PERFECT in performance.

    So are these Mejlik clones or are they something different?

    -Mike
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Wayne Galligan 
      To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:06 PM
      Subject: Re: Three blade size


      Cleveland props does make a c.fiber 16x11  and I am using one on my OS 1.40 and I like it.

      see this link:

      http://pages.prodigy.net/gcleveland_grsmodels/_import/pages.prodigy.net/gcleveland_grsmodels/index6.html

      Wayne Galligan
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: randy10926 at comcast.net 
        To: discussion at nsrca.org 
        Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:01 PM
        Subject: Re: Three blade size


        I wish they made a 3 blade 16X11

          -------------- Original message -------------- 

          Does anyone make a three blade 16 x 10 ?

          Bob Pastorello
          www.rcaerobats.net
          rcaerobob at cox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050610/ea640787/attachment-0001.html