[SPAM] RE: Focus In Aircraft
Bob Richards
bob at toprudder.com
Thu Jul 28 11:57:35 AKDT 2005
My dad always counted on 10gph with his 182, but he
also flew slightly less than 75% power. (My dad is a
tightwad!) We figured about 15mpg.
With the Winnie, you aren't paying for the price of
avgas!
Bob R.
--- John Ferrell <johnferrell at earthlink.net> wrote:
> C172 8 gallons per hour +
> C182 13 gph +
> C206 16 gph +
>
> As I recall. It makes the Winnibago's 10-11 mpg a
> lot easier to take...
> But us old F***s can handle a little more time in
> travel.
>
> John Ferrell
> http://DixieNC.US
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: randy10926 at comcast.net
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:33 AM
> Subject: [SPAM] RE: Focus In Aircraft
>
>
> That brings back a lot of nice memories from my
> youth - Traveling with the family in the 182. I
> grow up being the navigator/auto-pilot since Mom was
> a little math challenged. I would have though a 206
> would be a nicer choice; though personally I always
> preferred the 180.
>
> Sure would make for shorter thrips than my current
> Ford Ranger plane carrier.
>
> Randy
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list