Nats Judging Rebate-keep their best SCORE!

[Ron Van Putte]

On Jul 27, 2005, at 6:05 PM, Bob Pastorello wrote:

> As a "non Nats" guy at the present - a thought - since a Rules cycle 
> submittal is pending, I think that ANY considerations about 
> "penalties" for not judging had BETTER BE BUILT INTO AMA rules.
> The AMA Sanctions a national event, and I would bet dollars to donuts 
> that a subsequent protest for zeroed rounds would WIN - due to the 
> fact that there is NO AMA provision in the rules to cover the 
> situations you all are describing.
>  
> I'm not taking sides, nor pointing fingers/blame.
>  
> Simply suggesting that NOW is the time to try and get a rule change to 
> support the propositions of "enforcement".  Could be important.-

This is something that was implemented in 1997, so it's not new.  
However, in this day of "everyone's a lawyer", I think a simple 
addition to the Nats entry form would be sufficient.  Something added 
to the part of the form where it says that everyone should expect to 
judge one 1/2 day session should do it.  It should say that anyone who 
failed to perform a scheduled judging session would have a zero instead 
of their highest score.  Entrants must sign the entry form for it to be 
a legitimate entry, so the entrant's signature should indicate their 
acceptance of the stipulation regarding judging responsibility.

Ron Van Putte
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1618 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050727/1fcd823d/attachment-0001.bin