NOT Nats

[Ed Deaver]

Lubbock is pretty centrally located also.  Just don't know how long we will have the 10000 ft runways and if the big dogs could land on a field 175ft wide.
 
In all honesty, we could easily run 4 flight lines at any given time!!!!!!!  2 pilot stations each flight line.  Tarmac for CL also.
 
Food for thought.
 
ed

RC Steve Sterling <rcsteve at tcrcm.org> wrote:
Just us chickens--
 
We need to stir up something controversial while the 'big boys' are duking it out at Nats.....
 
Hummmm, Artistic Aerobatics, 2 vs 4 stroke, changing TX frequencies--- yawn-- all been done.
 
How about-- "Moving NATS around to different locations".  Oklahoma sounds good.  Or how about Southeastern Washington state, Kennewick, Pasco, Richland-- I think they had the NATS here in '89.  Wind howled the whole week. Like it is doing outside right now!!!  We call the place the "Dri-Shitties" instead of the Tri-Cities.  About 4 inches of rain a year, and if you don't learn to fly in the wind, you don't fly much!
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 6:00 AM
To: NSRCA
Subject: NOT Nats


Okay - who else, besides me, didn't make the trip?  Are there any of us that can discuss some questions?

Bob Pastorello
www.rcaerobats.net
rcaerobob at cox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050717/59f9dfec/attachment.html