[SPAM] Re: Great start to the year. . .

Rodney Tanner rodney19821982 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 31 09:20:20 AKST 2005


Hi Bob, 
I found it helped on the verticals, loop tracking and the tops of square loops, but  what I really like is being able to take OUT the right trim, which was adversely effecting rolls, point rolls and outside loops, which are now a lot easier as you are not having to compensate for right trim. On planes with a lot of rudder authority I think this is a sensible mix option, like low throttle to elevator to take out the pull to canopy in the down lines. 
I have 2.5 degrees of r-thrust on an OS 140RX, turning an APC 17x12.

Bob Pastorello <rcaerobob at cox.net> wrote:
Sounds pretty good, Rodney.  Tell us about the throttle>rudder mix.  What did you notice first?  How does it help?  What specifically is better/easier?
 
The ATV thing for SURE is right....my rule of thumb has ALWAYS been get 100% or greater before doing any serious stuff.

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rodney Tanner 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:47 PM
Subject: Great start to the year. . . 


Just one month into the year and I think the NSRCA sub is already a bargin! 
The tips here (throttle to rudder mix) and Troy´s article on aileron linkages in the Jan ´K-Factor made a big difference on my Tem-Phoon today. 
So if your aileron DRs are below 80%,  your ATVs are as screwed up as mine were and you have servo arm is over 1/2" you might want to make some ajustments. They really work. Thanks Troy, I´m looking forward to the next article.
 
Rodney   
 


 


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050131/abb769f6/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list