Redundancy

[Wladimir Kummer de Paula]

I think the best approach would a pack with diode protected cells, in a 
total of six, and a "intelligent" regulator that would advise the pilot 
if one cell has gone bad or if the pack is low on energy.

Wladimir


Ron Van Putte escreveu:

> There's been a lot of discussion about using two battery packs to 
> provide extra capacity and redundancy.  However, as Dean Pappas 
> mentioned earlier, most battery packs fail shorted, so they still 
> provide energy, albeit at reduced voltage and with limited current.  
> However, I have seen many servos fail and their failure mode is 
> usually "dead at neutral" or "dead hard over".  Neither of these modes 
> of failure is particularly conducive to airplane well being.  Most of 
> us use two aileron servos and having two aileron servos saved two 
> different airplanes of mine.  One servo failed "dead at neutral" and 
> the other "dead hard over".  The first was not a problem.  The second 
> was a struggle, but I got it on the ground safely.  After the second 
> servo failure on aileron, I started using dual elevator servos on all 
> my airplanes.  I haven't had a servo fail on elevator yet, but, if one 
> does, I'll have a fighting chance to get the airplane back on the 
> ground safely.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
>
>

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.