any merit in running dual battery packs ?
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Mon Jan 24 07:16:51 AKST 2005
In a message dated 1/24/2005 7:19:07 AM Eastern Standard Time,
hitesh at salt.ac.za writes:
Hi,
Now that we all using high powered digital servo's with incredible holding
power etc - is there any merit in running 2 battery packs, say 1 Ah each as
opposed to 1 high capacity pack thereby eliminating the single point failure ?
If I did want to run 2 packs, is a diode necessary to prevent 1 pack from
possibly charging the other if 1 pack were to go bad ?
Cheers,
Hitesh
Hitesh, a 1500 to 2000ma battery is all you need. There's little advantage
to redundancy unless you are planning to fly more than 5-7 flights (res) on
any given day. But then again, I use NiMH on the airborne and only Sanyo packs,
which have proven extremely reliable for several years now. As such, a
redundant power source isn't really necessary in pattern models and you can avoid
some unnecessary weight build up.
What has been done in large models is to add another battery and switch
harness to an unused channel on the receiver, which provides adequate
redundancy. The extra weight on such models isn't as critical as it is in pattern
models. Both switches "on" at take-off please.
Of course, if you just have to have the extra battery and you have enough
weight margin and room, the above is one way to do it. There are other ways, but
this is simple and reliable.
MattK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050124/6d6c4410/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list