Sequence Building

[Lance Van Nostrand]

It could work, but I am not sure I agree there's a necessary link between 
championship level flying and good sequence designing.  The best coaches 
aren't always the best players, just the ones that can communicate their 
extensive knowledge most effectively.  What we need is extensive knowledge 
and communication skills.
--Lance

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rcaerobob at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 3:10 PM
Subject: Sequence Building


> Here's a thought (probably ice/cold induced) regarding how we could form 
> "committees" to examine/evaluate our sequences...
> How about we have a core committee comprised of the National and District 
> Champions in each class?  That would give us a pretty large pool of 
> proven, competent, competitive pilots who know what it takes to win...and 
> probably would have a good sense of "building block" complexity.
>
> THe NSRCA Board could appoint an oversight group of Board 
> members/volunteers to facilitate the work....but it would give all the 
> NSRCA winners a voice in determining what happens....
>
> Is this totally whacked out???
>
> Bob Pastorello
> Ice-storm victim and simulator pilot :-)
> (and sometimes Masters actual flier)
>
> Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.