Annex proposal

[randy10926 at comcast.net]

maybe it's time to dust it off and re-submit it.  Maybe more contest board members will attend and vote.  It sounds like a good idea to try and rework this before all the scedules are submitted.

Randy Hatfield


-------------- Original message -------------- 

> 
> On Jan 5, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Joe Lachowski wrote: 
> 
> > It might have passed if it was written and ironed out before the 
> > proposal was submitted. It probably would have had a much better 
> > chance. The competition board would have at least had something to 
> > work with in making their decision. 
> 
> That's not true. The only way AMA would have accepted an annex 
> proposal was if AMA had veto power over the maneuver schedules. The 
> original proposal did not have that. The second proposal did give AMA 
> veto power, but didn't pass because one contest board member didn't 
> vote. 
> 
> Ron Van Putte 
> 
> > 
> >> From: "Del Rykert" 
> >> Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
> >> To: 
> >> Subject: Re: Annex proposal 
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:07:35 -0500 
> >> 
> >> It was tried to implement but shot down Terry. 
> >> 
> >> del 
> >> 
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: Terry Brox 
> >> To: discussion at nsrca.org 
> >> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:44 PM 
> >> Subject: Annex proposal 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> What is the real or perceived problem with the Annex system. I am 
> >> not an IMAC flier, but it looks like it works well for them. 
> >> I don't want to start a war here, but I am not sure why one would 
> >> have a problem with a system that could help alleviate the problems 
> >> associated with our current system. Lets hear both sides. 
> >> Respectfully Terry Brox 
> > 
> > 
> > ================================================= 
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to 
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/ 
> > To be removed from this list, go to 
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm 
> > and follow the instructions. 
> > 
> 
> ================================================= 
> To access the email archives for this list, go to 
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/ 
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm 
> and follow the instructions. 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050105/faf65fe0/attachment-0001.html