Poll on Sequence Purpose

[William C. Harden]

Yeah, I'm certain what you say is true.  Only those who wanted to vote
did, and the time limit to vote wasn't very long.  But the result would
be a good indicator to consider bringing this issue to vote by the
entire NSRCA body.  
 
One way to distribute a vote like this would be through the K-Factor and
in addition to a paper ballot the NSRCA site could be used for those who
choose to use it.  The details could be worked out later.  
 
The purpose of the AMA sequences does in deed matter and I believe the
future of pattern in the US depends on getting it right.
 
Bill
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 6:44 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
Doing the final stuff now....but.....the response AIN'T no "Majority",
fer shure!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
More news in a bit.

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: William <mailto:flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net>  C. Harden 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: RE: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
Very good Ed.  I'm anxious to know how the majority of the pattern
community considers this an issue. 
 
Bill
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Ed Hartley
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 6:26 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
True, on the first! I took it down around 12:00 EST. I would put it back
up but I erased it. 
 
We also said the vote would be reported this evening. Bob and I were to
count and I have sent my count to him for verification and comparison to
his!

Sorry,
Ed
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Del Rykert <mailto:drykert at localnet.com>  
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
It was stated on the list it would come down the First..  This is the
first...
 
    del
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Paul Horan <mailto:phoran at vvm.com>  
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
Lance,    I used the link yesterday to vote but it is G O N E today.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lance Van Nostrand <mailto:patterndude at comcast.net>  
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
am I blind?  There's no link I can see.
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bob Pastorello <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>  
To: NSRCA <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>  
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: Poll on Sequence Purpose
 
In case there are lurkers who haven't been poring over the volumnious
thread about this....Tony authorized a survey/poll question be placed on
the NSRCA main page.
Please participate.
 
<<This time your wish happens to be our command! Tony Stillman gave me
permission to put this question in a poll on the NSRCA site. The link is
on the opening page.
"Should the progression of classes within AMA precision aerobatics be
designed to prepare a person for the FAI class?"
 
A couple of words of netiquette! Please only vote once. If you don't
compete in pattern please don't vote.

Thanks,
Ed Hartley
roho2 at rcpattern.com >>

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050102/8c5856ce/attachment.html