A Proposal - Size v.s. Weight

William C. Harden flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net
Fri Feb 25 17:05:00 AKST 2005


Sounds reasonable to me Bob.
 
Bill
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 6:44 PM
To: NSRCA
Subject: A Proposal - Size v.s. Weight
 
Here's a thought - before you die laughing - think about all the things
we have read the past three days, and test those issues against this
rule....
 
"Models shall not exceed 5kg, ready-to-fly, without fuel in the case of
internal combustion powerplants, with batteries installed in the case of
electric powerplant.  Models shall not exceed 72" x 72" overall length
and overall wingspan.  There shall be no displacement (or
horsepower/wattage rating) limits to  powerplants, except that in no
case shall the model exceed 96 db noise levels, measured per AMA noise
standard testing."
 
Could this help the issues that seem to be nagging at us?

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050226/29945fa5/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list