[SPAM] Re: 160s and Tower
Dean Pappas
d.pappas at kodeos.com
Wed Feb 16 08:02:35 AKST 2005
You realize that the new Dave Patrick Models engines are just MOKIs re-compressed for 15%.
Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:20 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: [SPAM] Re: 160s and Tower
Plus, the Moki thrives on FAI fuel; it's hard to get less expensive fuel than that, and stay in the alcohol category. I've got 1-1.80 and 2-2.10's I echo what Matt says. I wonder how much weight you'd save if you milled off those stout beam mounting ears, and just radial mounted it? Bill Glaze
Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
Brian, Why use anything else? Well, weight is an issue, and for some designs, the side exhaust is an issue, but thta's about it. The webra is a powerhouse but has had a bad run of pumps, and these have given us fits. There's nothing wrong with the engine tho.
To be honest, if weight wasn't an issue, I would use the MOKI 180. I have not used an engine more user friendly or more robust than that one, and has power to burn. Piped, propped and mounted correctly, it could be made fairly quiet. It was nice to just fuel it, prime it, one flip start it, and have it last several seasons without any hint of a problem. No bearings, no rods, no rings, or anything else for that matter.
Matt
In a message dated 2/16/2005 9:29:17 AM Eastern Standard Time, randy10926 at comcast.net writes:
I am switching from Webra to OS160 this season. OS160 does weight more, so I am having to move the battery back many inches.
Randy
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Billings <mailto:auto7832 at bellsouth.net>
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: 160s and Tower
Heck, why do we buy Webra's?
----- Original Message -----
From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: 160s and Tower
Have used it going on fifth season now. Even though it only has around 300 flights in that time span, I still run the original bearings and can just fuel it, prime it and fire it up. It just keeps on ticking and believe me it has taken quite a lickin'. And still have not bothered to use a pump on it. I have to believe it has served better than the full blown "pattern" engines overall.
How could you go wrong for that price? Heck how could you go wrong, period!!
MattK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050216/f694fd6a/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list