Moki 180

[Ron Van Putte]

On Feb 16, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:

> To be honest, if weight wasn't an issue, I would use the MOKI 180. I 
> have not used an engine more user friendly or more robust than that 
> one, and has power to burn. Piped, propped and mounted correctly, it 
> could be made fairly quiet. It was nice to just fuel it, prime it, one 
> flip start it, and have it last several seasons without any hint of a 
> problem. No bearings, no rods, no rings, or anything else for that 
> matter.

I have virtually no experience with MOKI engines, other than to sell 
fuel to owners and listen to complaints from the ones who aren't 
convinced that MOKIs want/need low % nitro fuel to operate properly.  
Does anyone care to comment which fuel works best in their MOKI?

Ron Van Putte
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 855 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050216/cf0bc813/attachment.bin