[SPAM] Re: *SPAM* Re: Rules Survey

Del K. Rykert drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Wed Feb 9 05:44:57 AKST 2005


It is illegal to decide at the time of the contest if you are changing the norm.. Has to be advertised and promoted in the pamphlets that you distribute. So attendees know what to expect. 
 
        Del
  nsrca - 473 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wayne Galligan 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:21 AM
  Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: *SPAM* Re: Rules Survey


  Bob,

  I wont disagree with you on CERTAIN conditions issues.  That's why the CD has the option to not judge the takeoff/landing(0 or 10).  I has been done on more then one occasion in D6 as the wind can get a little testy in the spring time.  Leave the rule in and let the CD decide at the time of the contest.  

  Wayne Galligan
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bob Richards 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:24 PM
    Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: *SPAM* Re: Rules Survey


    I don't think takeoffs and landings should be judged. At some contests and field conditions, it is simply dangerous to force everyone to land in front of the judges. This is especially true if the wind conditions change during a flight and the pilot is expected to land downwind cause that is the direction he took off. I have seen it happen. Takeoffs and landings are not aerobatic maneuvers by anyone's definition.

    As for weight, if the 2m size becomes the only restriction, then you might see some IMAC legal biplanes entered, weighing 25+ lbs. A 2m Ultimate bipe would be huge. Would that be a problem? Depends on who is flying it, I suppose. Would that be an advantage? If someone wins with one, then it will be a perceived advantage. Everyone will have to have one.

    My 2cw.

    Bob R.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050209/f3496587/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list