OFF topic subject worthy of viewing

[Terry Terrenoire]

I have heard this from other Reps and finall heard a good explanation
today on the radio.
Yes, they may be covered by SSI, but ONLY if they have 10 quarters of
payments from a job.
So they can honestly say that they are under SSI, but they don't tell you
that it is from prior employment.
If you ever get a chance to ask your Rep, As just how much monthly income
they will be receiving 
when they retire.

Terry T.


On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:04:01 -0500 Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
writes:
Ron:
Right on.. I heard Senator Boxer say on TV that "Well, I'm covered by
Social Security too.................."  Another lie.  Bill Glaze

Ron Van Putte wrote:



On Feb 7, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Ed Miller wrote: 


We need a world where those setting policy are the ones responsible to
carry it out too..........I wonder if we'd ever have wars then. 


That point has been made many times with no result. A question I'd like
to hear an answer to is, "If Social Security is so great and doesn't need
to be fixed, why aren't Congresspersons and Senators covered by it,
rather than their own system?" Sorry, but that was WAY off topic. 

Ron Van Putte 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rick Wallace 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:47 PM 
Subject: Re: OFF topic subject worthy of viewing 


I'm reading into Nat's comment that he believes the mission might not be
a 'right/good' one, but given that our guys are there, they deserve our
total support - since they're the guys who're carrying out the policy,
not the ones setting it... 

That's certianly how I feel about the issue of our guys in Iraq/
Afgahnistan/ etc- too many friends / comrades/ classmates over there to
feel otherwise. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050207/d470a8b9/attachment.html