Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Wed Aug 3 07:37:06 AKDT 2005
Earl, Buddy,
Here it is..............
Intermediate - 14 Contestants x 15 In-Flight Maneuvers = 210 Scoring
Opportunities
Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
No of 2pt "Spreads" 26 31 21 29 17 41 27.50
% of 210 12.38% 14.76% 10.00% 13.81% 8.10% 19.52% 13.10%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 4 11 6 6 1 9 6.17
% of 210 1.90% 5.24% 2.86% 2.86% 0.48% 4.29% 2.94%
Advanced - 22 Contestants x 17 In-Flight Maneuvers = 374 Scoring
Opportunities
Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
No of 2pt "Spreads" 102 69 163 82 77 49 90.33
% of 374 27.27% 18.45% 43.58% 21.93% 20.59% 13.10% 24.15%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 23 19 67 18 11 9 24.50
% of 374 6.15% 5.08% 17.91% 4.81% 2.94% 2.41% 6.55%
Masters Preliminaries - 38 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 798
Scoring Opportunities
Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
No of 2pt "Spreads" 130 108 208 107 210 200 160.50
% of 798 16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41% 26.32% 25.06% 20.11%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 34 28 59 24 49 39 38.83
% of 798 4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01% 6.14% 4.89% 4.87%
FAI Preliminaries - 29 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 609 Scoring
Opportunities
Round 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
No of 2pt "Spreads" 129 155 119 229 114 176 153.67
% of 609 21.18% 25.45% 19.54% 37.60% 18.72% 28.90% 25.23%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 18 38 16 59 21 38 31.67
% of 609 2.96% 6.24% 2.63% 9.69% 3.45% 6.24% 5.20%
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Plano, TX
AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Earl Haury
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:31 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
Gene
Good info, and pretty reasonable spreads. It would be interesting to see
like data from the other classes. One might expect Masters to have the
lowest spread, as they are being judged by the most experienced fliers (not
necessarily judges).
Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Maurice
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:51 AM
Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
Don,
Here's some stats to mull over........
I've pulled all of the scores into a spreadsheet and identified every
instance where the difference between any of the 3 judges raw scores was
plus or minus more than 2 points, then plus or minus more than 3 points
Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually flying x 21 scored maneuvers
(excluded TO and Land.) = 798 "judging opportunities" in each of 6 rounds.
Round 1 2 3
4 5 6
No of 2pt "Spreads" 130 108 208 107
210 200
% of 798 16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41%
26.32% 25.06%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 34 28 59 24
49 39
% of 798 4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01%
6.14% 4.89%
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Plano, TX
AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Don Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
We have heard from a lot of Advanced pilots about the judging on that line.
I would like some feed back from Masters and FAI on the prelims judges. My
very limited survey seems to indicated that those lines had very good
judging. I had a lot of 5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my scores,
in my opinion, were spot on. I'm only asking about the prelims.
Don
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list