Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
Wed Aug 3 04:06:14 AKDT 2005
In a message dated 8/3/2005 6:52:09 AM Central Daylight Time,
gene.maurice at comcast.net writes:
Don,
Here’s some stats to mull over………………..
I’ve pulled all of the scores into a spreadsheet and identified every
instance where the difference between any of the 3 judges raw scores was plus or
minus more than 2 points, then plus or minus more than 3 points
Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually flying x 21 scored maneuvers (exc
luded TO and Land.) = 798 “judging opportunities” in each of 6 rounds.
Round 1 2 3 4 5
6
No of 2pt "Spreads" 130 108 208 107
210 200
% of 798 16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41%
26.32% 25.06%
No of 3pt "Spreads" 34 28 59
24 49 39
% of 798 4.26% 3.51% 7.39% 3.01%
6.14% 4.89%
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Plano, TX
AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
____________________________________
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Don Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
We have heard from a lot of Advanced pilots about the judging on that line.
I would like some feed back from Masters and FAI on the prelims judges. My
very limited survey seems to indicated that those lines had very good
judging. I had a lot of 5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my scores, in my
opinion, were spot on. I'm only asking about the prelims.
Don
Gene
Interesting numbers I'm curious if it's not to much trouble how do the other
classes compare in relation to masters?
Buddy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050803/a13e4bad/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list