[SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
Ed Alt
ed_alt at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 30 17:50:47 AKDT 2005
Eric, I haven't weighed it yet, will try tomorrow if my friend reads his
email and remembers to bring it to the field.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
> Ed,
> The bounce is coming from the springy tension in the wires. The
> rudder can be moved before the servo arm moves. Troy told me that he and
> TF use 2 strand CL wire to stop the "spring/stretch" effect on their
> rudders.
>
> I figure if I can get to do it on the bench, then don't fly it like that.
> If yours does not do it with the rudder hanging free, i.e. the tail-wheel
> is off the ground, then you could be OK. Did you weigh the OTOP rudder?
>
> Eric.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 5:24 AM
> Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>
>
>> meant to say stored energy in the flexed hinges, not 'fixed' hinges
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ed Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 5:21 AM
>> Subject: [SPAM] Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>
>>
>>> Eric
>>> Just curious about more details on the hinging on the Impact. Having
>>> just completed an OTOP, I wonder if the Impact has a similar
>>> arrangement. If I would have gone with the stock setup, it would have
>>> meant that 4 small Robart hines would be hanging suspended in air over
>>> 1/4" either side of the hinge line. This seemed unacceptable, as I
>>> figured it would just break the hinges in short order from all the
>>> flexing of the unsupported plastic. All I did was to add balsa filler
>>> blocks for each hinge location. It required cutting off the nub on the
>>> bottom of the rudder to let me slide the blocks in, but that was easy to
>>> do and reset the piece later. Rock solid so far (7 flights) with an
>>> 8411 converted to SA and this rudder is realtively heavy as well. I
>>> don't have the weight figure, but can get it from a friends unfinished
>>> OTOP if it helps to unravel the mystery.
>>>
>>> I guess the point of asking about this is that there may be a combined
>>> effect of the relatively high mass of the ruuder and the flex of the
>>> hinges if something similar was in play with your original setup. I
>>> understand the way the oscillations could start/sustain with just too
>>> much mass for the setup to contend with. However any flex could make it
>>> even easier to commence, as the servo's attempt to arrest rudder
>>> movement would be hampered and secondary movements from the stored
>>> energy in the fixed hinges would have to be dealt with milliseconds
>>> later.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 12:43 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jim,
>>>> I had already converted the IMPACT supplied rudder over to a
>>>> regular Mylar hinge set up because of the side-play in the hinge-pin
>>>> design supplied.
>>>>
>>>> It oscillated with the stick pin hinges at the first switch-on. I
>>>> "pulled" the composite the rudder off and fitted it with a new
>>>> stern-post and beveled the LE, on the rudder. Then I tried all of the
>>>> servos previously listed.
>>>>
>>>> I then cut off the IMPACT rudder and fitted the new (red) one as you
>>>> can see on RCU.
>>>>
>>>> As powerful as our new digital servos are I don't think that they
>>>> "brake" the return swing as well as they initiate the first
>>>> movement/response.
>>>>
>>>> It is noticeable that the bigger planes use multiple servos with the
>>>> thinking that more power is needed. It is more stopping power that,
>>>> IMHO, the we really need.
>>>>
>>>> I had an 8611 that bounced when used to drive a big old VISION rudder.
>>>> After fitting a damper from an RC car it performs flawlessly.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Eric.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "J.Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com>
>>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:26 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Eric,
>>>>> What you were experiencing was oscillation of a servomechanism and
>>>>> that
>>>>> could contribute to flutter and flutter could be what is breaking the
>>>>> Impacts but I've never heard anyone say they heard the rudder flutter
>>>>> before
>>>>> the fuse exploded. I don't think we understand the root cause yet.
>>>>> Right now I'm interested in the servo/rudder oscillation. I'm
>>>>> wondering if
>>>>> the real solution is completely due to the light weight rudder or/and
>>>>> to an
>>>>> improved hinging system, or did both have the same hinge installation?
>>>>> Can
>>>>> you hang weight on your present rudder and make it oscillate? It sure
>>>>> would
>>>>> be nice to cure this problem for all time because I've seen it on many
>>>>> planes. I've never heard of it breaking fuselages before though.
>>>>> Thanks for all of your experimentation. In the end it is more
>>>>> important
>>>>> than understanding the theory.
>>>>> Jim O
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
>>>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:55 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter,
>>>>>> I nearly got to go to bed.! ...Just ran
>>>>>> downstairs...Tripped
>>>>>> over #2 Son who is back from carrier duty - he said we dropped a lot
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> "stuff " out there. Planes all came back without ordnance,! No lost
>>>>>> planes....A bit worried about the local girls however.. it must be
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> uniform thing :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where was I?...Both supplied IMPACT rudders weigh 3.1 oz each without
>>>>> hinges
>>>>>> or horns
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Replacement rudders weigh 1.3 oz before covering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried the supplied rudder and five different servos including an
>>>>>> 8611
>>>>> and
>>>>>> they all bounced back and forth badly and were potentially
>>>>>> destructively.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I then cut it off (the old rudder) and fitted a foam balsa
>>>>>> replacement.
>>>>>> Tests showed no bounce with any of the servos. [8611, 8411, 8417,
>>>>>> 8417
>>>>> with
>>>>>> 8411 gears and the heli 8311 (nylon gears except for output shaft.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did managed to stop the bounce another way. I also tried using a
>>>>>> single
>>>>>> wire as opposed to multi-strand. It did work but once in a while I
>>>>>> saw bad
>>>>>> "hunting" as it located the center.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These Impacts have polyurethane foam liners about 1.5-mm thick with a
>>>>>> skin
>>>>>> of glass inside that. They are pretty stiff to begin with.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did notice that a vertical former at the rear of the canopy area
>>>>>> made a
>>>>>> huge difference in stiffness. Also switching to a four bolt wing
>>>>>> retention
>>>>>> system made the center more rigid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have abused my IMPACT #1 and hope that all the mods keep doing
>>>>>> their
>>>>> job.
>>>>>> I still think that the rudder is simply just too heavy and the
>>>>>> spring/stretch in the pull-pull wire combines to oscillate the rudder
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> like PIO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Peter Pennisi" <pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
>>>>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:19 PM
>>>>>> Subject: RE: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I am aware of the braces and internal formers. There have been
>>>>>> > recent
>>>>>> > cases
>>>>>> > of failures with all the supporting structures in place.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Eric,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > How much do your new rudders weigh typically?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Peter
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Peter Pennisi
>>>>>> > Pentagon Systems QLD Pty Ltd
>>>>>> > P.O Box 4280
>>>>>> > Eight Mile Plains
>>>>>> > QLD 4113
>>>>>> > Australia
>>>>>> > Phone: 61+0738414234
>>>>>> > Fax: 61+0738414264
>>>>>> > Mobile: 0408007206
>>>>>> > Email: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>>>>>> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>>>>>> > On
>>>>>> > Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
>>>>>> > Sent: Friday, 29 April 2005 4:56 AM
>>>>>> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>>>> > Subject: RE: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Well...I can certainly speak to needing this in the Rev Pro...which
>>>>>> > I'm
>>>>>> > guessing isn't a whole lot different than the Impact in
>>>>>> > construction.
>>>>>> > The fuselage buckled and snapped in half in flight (and yes...it
>>>>>> > still
>>>>>> > managed to fly to the ground with relatively little damage). Added
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > light (4gm) "Ladder" crutch plate behind the wing and no problems
>>>>>> > at
>>>>>> > all.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I have a photo of the brace if someone is interested...contact me
>>>>>> > offline.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Mark
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>>>>>> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>>>>>> > On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
>>>>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:26 PM
>>>>>> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I have had conversations with a few people that own these airframes
>>>>>> > (Impact)and they along with a few others have strengthened the fuse
>>>>>> > in
>>>>>> > two
>>>>>> > ways. A ladder type frame in the fuse from the wing t.e back to
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > stab
>>>>>> > area and another put a stiffener(former) at the front of the wing
>>>>>> > area
>>>>>> > to
>>>>>> > decrease the possibility of compression of the fuse in this area.
>>>>>> > It is
>>>>>> > believed that compression of the fuse in this area contributes to a
>>>>>> > wave
>>>>>> > progression all the way back to the tail section. The tail section
>>>>>> > being
>>>>>> > the smallest and weakest area gets whipped and eventually the fuse
>>>>>> > breaks or
>>>>>> > contributes to tail feather flutters.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > From what I've heard.... FWIW
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > WG
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> > From: "Peter Pennisi" <pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
>>>>>> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:29 AM
>>>>>> > Subject: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Most of you would be aware that a number of Composite ARF "IMPACT"
>>>>>> > have
>>>>>> >> failed from suspected rudder flutter.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I raise a couple of questions to this forum;
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I know that the purposes of counterbalances are to reduce the
>>>>>> >> loads on
>>>>>> >> servos and linkages in our application but what are the side
>>>>>> >> effects.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Can a rudder counterbalance create undesired torsional stresses on
>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>> >> fuselage?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Can a poorly configured and tensioned pull-pull linkage to the
>>>>>> >> rudder
>>>>>> > be
>>>>>> >> more susceptible to flutter if the rudder has a counterbalance?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> What other types of forces are at play with counterbalances?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I am just trying to find a reason for the relatively high failure
>>>>>> > rates
>>>>>> >> against this design.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> It is the same old thing- why are some people having problems and
>>>>>> > others
>>>>>> >> don't. (Similar story to 4-stroke exhaust headers)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I will be test flying my model soon so I am obviously concerned.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Peter
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> =================================================
>>>>>> >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>>> >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>>> >> To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>>> >> and follow the instructions.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from
>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>> > list.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > =================================================
>>>>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > list.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ================To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > list.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > =================================================
>>>>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > list.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =================================================
>>>>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>>> To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>>>> list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> =================================================
>>>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>>> To be removed from this list, go to
>>>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>>>> list.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>>> To be removed from this list, go to
>>>> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>>
>>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>> list.
>>>
>>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>> list.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> list.
>
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list