Budd OS 1.60 Mount

[Bill Pritchett]

Bill:
I think the integral nose ring is a "handy" thing for the removable cowl planes, but I'm not convinced that they work as well as the hard mounted ring on a solid nose....  Bob Pastorello shows a way to put a nose ring on that transfers to the firewall - a better setup, to me, than a part of the mount.
I should know more in a couple days - nothing beats flying to check stuff out!
Bill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Glaze 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 4:41 PM
  Subject: Re: Budd OS 1.60 Mount


  Bill:
  Agreed.  Mine for my Y.S. series engines looks great.  He's working on an integral nose ring right now.  I can hardly wait...........Bill Glaze

  Bill Pritchett wrote: 
    I received mine yesterday and it's really great.  For me it was a retrofit of an OS 1.60...... so handy that all motors with this mount setup are at the same place for the spinner backplate.  And, how 'bout that great price??
    Bill


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Bob Pastorello 
      To: NSRCA 
      Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:03 AM
      Subject: Budd OS 1.60 Mount


      I've received mine, and will probably install this weekend, since I'm house-bound yet again.  I'll do updates and pics on my site when running.  It looks like a truly first-rate mount, and probably the lightest and most rigid beam setup I think I've seen.

      Looks like a "necessity" in the building shop.

      Bob Pastorello
      www.rcaerobats.net
      rcaerobob at cox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050430/55ff0ce3/attachment.html