[SPAM] Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
Ed Alt
ed_alt at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 30 01:22:08 AKDT 2005
Eric
Just curious about more details on the hinging on the Impact. Having just
completed an OTOP, I wonder if the Impact has a similar arrangement. If I
would have gone with the stock setup, it would have meant that 4 small
Robart hines would be hanging suspended in air over 1/4" either side of the
hinge line. This seemed unacceptable, as I figured it would just break the
hinges in short order from all the flexing of the unsupported plastic. All
I did was to add balsa filler blocks for each hinge location. It required
cutting off the nub on the bottom of the rudder to let me slide the blocks
in, but that was easy to do and reset the piece later. Rock solid so far (7
flights) with an 8411 converted to SA and this rudder is realtively heavy as
well. I don't have the weight figure, but can get it from a friends
unfinished OTOP if it helps to unravel the mystery.
I guess the point of asking about this is that there may be a combined
effect of the relatively high mass of the ruuder and the flex of the hinges
if something similar was in play with your original setup. I understand the
way the oscillations could start/sustain with just too much mass for the
setup to contend with. However any flex could make it even easier to
commence, as the servo's attempt to arrest rudder movement would be hampered
and secondary movements from the stored energy in the fixed hinges would
have to be dealt with milliseconds later.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
> Jim,
> I had already converted the IMPACT supplied rudder over to a
> regular Mylar hinge set up because of the side-play in the hinge-pin
> design supplied.
>
> It oscillated with the stick pin hinges at the first switch-on. I "pulled"
> the composite the rudder off and fitted it with a new stern-post and
> beveled the LE, on the rudder. Then I tried all of the servos previously
> listed.
>
> I then cut off the IMPACT rudder and fitted the new (red) one as you can
> see on RCU.
>
> As powerful as our new digital servos are I don't think that they "brake"
> the return swing as well as they initiate the first movement/response.
>
> It is noticeable that the bigger planes use multiple servos with the
> thinking that more power is needed. It is more stopping power that, IMHO,
> the we really need.
>
> I had an 8611 that bounced when used to drive a big old VISION rudder.
> After fitting a damper from an RC car it performs flawlessly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>
>
>> Eric,
>> What you were experiencing was oscillation of a servomechanism and that
>> could contribute to flutter and flutter could be what is breaking the
>> Impacts but I've never heard anyone say they heard the rudder flutter
>> before
>> the fuse exploded. I don't think we understand the root cause yet.
>> Right now I'm interested in the servo/rudder oscillation. I'm wondering
>> if
>> the real solution is completely due to the light weight rudder or/and to
>> an
>> improved hinging system, or did both have the same hinge installation?
>> Can
>> you hang weight on your present rudder and make it oscillate? It sure
>> would
>> be nice to cure this problem for all time because I've seen it on many
>> planes. I've never heard of it breaking fuselages before though.
>> Thanks for all of your experimentation. In the end it is more important
>> than understanding the theory.
>> Jim O
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>
>>
>>> Peter,
>>> I nearly got to go to bed.! ...Just ran downstairs...Tripped
>>> over #2 Son who is back from carrier duty - he said we dropped a lot of
>>> "stuff " out there. Planes all came back without ordnance,! No lost
>>> planes....A bit worried about the local girls however.. it must be that
>>> uniform thing :-)
>>>
>>> Where was I?...Both supplied IMPACT rudders weigh 3.1 oz each without
>> hinges
>>> or horns
>>>
>>> Replacement rudders weigh 1.3 oz before covering.
>>>
>>> I tried the supplied rudder and five different servos including an 8611
>> and
>>> they all bounced back and forth badly and were potentially
>>> destructively.
>>>
>>> I then cut it off (the old rudder) and fitted a foam balsa replacement.
>>> Tests showed no bounce with any of the servos. [8611, 8411, 8417, 8417
>> with
>>> 8411 gears and the heli 8311 (nylon gears except for output shaft.]
>>>
>>> I did managed to stop the bounce another way. I also tried using a
>>> single
>>> wire as opposed to multi-strand. It did work but once in a while I saw
>>> bad
>>> "hunting" as it located the center.
>>>
>>> These Impacts have polyurethane foam liners about 1.5-mm thick with a
>>> skin
>>> of glass inside that. They are pretty stiff to begin with.
>>>
>>> I did notice that a vertical former at the rear of the canopy area made
>>> a
>>> huge difference in stiffness. Also switching to a four bolt wing
>>> retention
>>> system made the center more rigid.
>>>
>>> I have abused my IMPACT #1 and hope that all the mods keep doing their
>> job.
>>> I still think that the rudder is simply just too heavy and the
>>> spring/stretch in the pull-pull wire combines to oscillate the rudder
>>> just
>>> like PIO.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Eric.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Peter Pennisi" <pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
>>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:19 PM
>>> Subject: RE: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I am aware of the braces and internal formers. There have been recent
>>> > cases
>>> > of failures with all the supporting structures in place.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Eric,
>>> >
>>> > How much do your new rudders weigh typically?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Peter
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Peter Pennisi
>>> > Pentagon Systems QLD Pty Ltd
>>> > P.O Box 4280
>>> > Eight Mile Plains
>>> > QLD 4113
>>> > Australia
>>> > Phone: 61+0738414234
>>> > Fax: 61+0738414264
>>> > Mobile: 0408007206
>>> > Email: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>>> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>>> > On
>>> > Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
>>> > Sent: Friday, 29 April 2005 4:56 AM
>>> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>> > Subject: RE: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>> >
>>> > Well...I can certainly speak to needing this in the Rev Pro...which
>>> > I'm
>>> > guessing isn't a whole lot different than the Impact in construction.
>>> > The fuselage buckled and snapped in half in flight (and yes...it still
>>> > managed to fly to the ground with relatively little damage). Added
>>> > the
>>> > light (4gm) "Ladder" crutch plate behind the wing and no problems at
>>> > all.
>>> >
>>> > I have a photo of the brace if someone is interested...contact me
>>> > offline.
>>> >
>>> > -Mark
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>>> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>>> > On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:26 PM
>>> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>> > Subject: Re: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>> >
>>> > I have had conversations with a few people that own these airframes
>>> > (Impact)and they along with a few others have strengthened the fuse in
>>> > two
>>> > ways. A ladder type frame in the fuse from the wing t.e back to the
>>> > stab
>>> > area and another put a stiffener(former) at the front of the wing area
>>> > to
>>> > decrease the possibility of compression of the fuse in this area. It
>>> > is
>>> > believed that compression of the fuse in this area contributes to a
>>> > wave
>>> > progression all the way back to the tail section. The tail section
>>> > being
>>> > the smallest and weakest area gets whipped and eventually the fuse
>>> > breaks or
>>> > contributes to tail feather flutters.
>>> >
>>> > From what I've heard.... FWIW
>>> >
>>> > WG
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Peter Pennisi" <pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
>>> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:29 AM
>>> > Subject: Rudder counterbalance ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Most of you would be aware that a number of Composite ARF "IMPACT"
>>> > have
>>> >> failed from suspected rudder flutter.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I raise a couple of questions to this forum;
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I know that the purposes of counterbalances are to reduce the loads
>>> >> on
>>> >> servos and linkages in our application but what are the side effects.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can a rudder counterbalance create undesired torsional stresses on
>>> >> the
>>> >> fuselage?
>>> >>
>>> >> Can a poorly configured and tensioned pull-pull linkage to the rudder
>>> > be
>>> >> more susceptible to flutter if the rudder has a counterbalance?
>>> >>
>>> >> What other types of forces are at play with counterbalances?
>>> >>
>>> >> I am just trying to find a reason for the relatively high failure
>>> > rates
>>> >> against this design.
>>> >>
>>> >> It is the same old thing- why are some people having problems and
>>> > others
>>> >> don't. (Similar story to 4-stroke exhaust headers)
>>> >>
>>> >> I will be test flying my model soon so I am obviously concerned.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Peter
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> =================================================
>>> >> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> >> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> >> To be removed from this list, go to
>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> >> and follow the instructions.
>>> >>
>>> >> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>> > list.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > =================================================
>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>> >
>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>> > list.
>>> >
>>> > ================To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>> >
>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>> > list.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > =================================================
>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> > To be removed from this list, go to
>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>> >
>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>>> > list.
>>> >
>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>> list.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
>> list.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the
> list.
>
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list