YS 160 DZ
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Tue Sep 28 05:49:38 AKDT 2004
Is every Y.S. 1.60 DZ owner running 30% nitro? At the field Saturday,
one of the pattern flyers mentioned that another had spent $160 for just
6 gallons of 30%.
I'm currently running 15% (Red Max) in my Y.S. 1.40 engines, and they
run just fine. (and run, and run, and run.........) I'm re-thinking my
lust to get a Y.S. 1.60; I had hoped the teething problems were over
after the engine's fine showing at the Nats, but I guess there's some
more progress that needs to be made before the engine is ready for us
mere mortals!<G>
Bill Glaze
mike mueller wrote:
> Troy I've made a few observations about the YS engines after using
> them for 3 out of the last 4 years. We have what I believe to be the
> largest pattern club in the country here in Chicago with at least 15
> dedicated flyers at our home field almost all use YS product..
> I think the YS DZ is the most powerful engine available today I also
> think they are very unreliable. We've had over a 60% failure rate this
> year alone with the DZ's being used here. When they run they are
> awesome and that's what keeps most of us here willing to fight thru
> the problems. We have had a lot of problems with the pumps. One of our
> sponsored flyers went thru 3 pumps on 1 engine this summer. These are
> people who have strong relationships with Verano.
> I have had a very good engine this year but it has continued to break
> head gaskets all year long and it leaks fuel to the point of being
> nicknamed the "Exxon Valdez". She's going back to the factory this week.
> I hope that YS takes there time with the release of the 160DZ and
> makes them more reliable. One of our really top flyers here has had so
> many problems with his 2 DZ's this year that it all but ruined his
> season. The guys a top auto mechanic and he knows engines.
> I'm going to stick with the DZ because I think it's like F1 racing.
> On the edge! Still one should know what there getting into with these
> expensive, finicky and complicated buggers.
> Also I know that our group has enough mechanical smarts to setup and
> run engines correctly. I'm hoping for the best here. Thanks, Mike
>
> Troy Newman <troy_newman at msn.com> wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> I have not seen the MA ad yet, but I do know that Yamada was
> playing with some new pump designs. This was a two fold deal: #1
> make the pump easier to produce (less $$ and less hassles) and #2
> to make the pump a more user friendly easier to adjust version.
> Now with this re-design I believe they found out some things in
> the longevity side of the equation and these applied to the std
> 140DZ pump. Then the 140DZ pump got an upgrade and met the goals
> of the new pump design and kept the parts the same in terms of
> looks. My original 160 DZ has the same pump as the 140DZ.
>
> I have run both pumps and they run the same. Then again I don't
> tend to have problems with my motors. They just run and run and
> run. I actually wear them out after hundreds of flights.
>
> TN
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Zoro1024 at aol.com <mailto:Zoro1024 at aol.com>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:19 PM
> Subject: Re: YS 160 DZ
>
> Kind of wonder myself, I see their add in the AMA magazine
> shows a different pump arrangement. Something has got to make
> them better, I've become the postman's best friend mailing the
> 140's back to NV.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you!
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/mobile/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo>
> Get it on your mobile phone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040928/393bfa82/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list